Have Legal Questions? Ask a Lawyer Now.
Thank you for your question. Please permit me to assist you with your concerns.To answer directly, such a contract is still valid. A contract can have missing terms that may later be put in once those terms are known. If your insurance is not yet known, for example, then a preliminary agreement without such terms is still sufficient. In terms of being 'stuck', if the other party has begun working on the contract, or the contract has been in place a significant amount of time, then the contract is binding. Very few contracts have a 'right of rescission' (early cancellation) clause unless so stated either in state law or in teh contract itself. I assume that the contract has no such clause but as for state law, unless this was an open solicitation agreement, it becomes binding the second you signed off. You can get out of an agreement but it will be based on the surrender charge of the 20% that you quoted. Please understand that I am basing my answer solely from your own facts. Perhaps your contract has a right to cancel, but you would need to review it for yourself. Otherwise, by signing, you did pledge to honor the terms.I am sorry.
Can he legally act as an adjuster based on the information I located below? Not sure if this applies in Texas.
People who act as contractors for policyholders can negotiate insurance claims only if they are licensed attorneys or licensed public insurance adjusters. If properly licensed, they can negotiate only if they are retained by the policyholders. In jurisdictions that allow a contractor to work on and act as a public insurance adjuster on a single claim, I imagine some contractors are retained as both. A conflict of interest seems inherent in the dual roles, and virtually every Bar Association in America would prohibit an attorney from representing a client as a contractor and legal counsel at the same time.
As I noted in Failure to Communicate with the Insured's Contractor is Bad Faith, this does not mean that once a policyholder has retained a contractor or roofing contractor insurance adjusters should not seek out and consider their opinions. However, it is illegal for an insurance adjuster and roofing contractor to negotiate or adjust a policyholder's claim together.
Thank you for your follow-up.He can act as your agent when he contacts the insurance company. Most contractors do so once they have a signed agreement as both the contractor and the insurance company have a vested interest in the repairs. He cannot act as his own adjuster, but he can discuss with their adjuster pertaining on potential issues that they may have missed or additional repairs stemming directly from the current loss. This is not a negotiation, it is simply an adjusted review of what the insurance adjuster may have missed.Hope that helps.
My concern lies in that I specifically told him I didnt want to file a claim if 100% of my roof wasnt damaged. He assurred me it was. However, he premarked the roof before the adjuster arrived. He only marked 75% of the roof. The 75% the adjuster covered. I think he intentionally did this so he could go back and haggle with the insurance company. The entire time the adjuster was on the roof with hishard of hearing son, he talked about how he was so against insurance fraud. I thought it was an odd conversation. I asked him why he would only mark 75% of the roof, which he replied, "I had to give the adjuster something to do." Then he said don't worry its not over, " you still the third party work Im going to do for you. Shady, Shady. I'm still kicking myself for signing the document.
Not yet. I was ok with working with him until his demeanor changed after asking him for a quote. I wanted to prepare financially for the 25%. I was taken aback when out of the blue he stated, " you need to stop talking to you insurance company. I am not the enemy." I then retraced our previous conversations and started to piece things together. And kicked myself for not getting the quote at the beginning. And of course, for signing the ridiculous document. I am afraid to discuss this with the insurance. Afraid they will say not our issue. And Im stuck with this dishonest roofer. What to do? What to do?
Thank you for your follow-up.I see your logic and I cannot say that I disagree with it. But at least so far while you have legitimate concerns, they are really mostly suspicions. That is not enough under which to claim that the other party breached the terms in bad faith. You are always free to cancel now but it will cost you, or you can potentially wait until he starts work and then find issues with his work and his repairs, which you could then communicate to the insurance company so that they will hold off payment. This isn't ideal by no means as you are really locked into this agreement at this time.Good luck.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).