This is related to previous question. The defendant's attorney filed a motion stating the defendant was not properly served and asking to set aside default judgement.
The default judgement supposes to be issued around the 20th of March. But it was not issued. The defendant's attorney filed the motion in early April. Should the judge issued default judgement on time, the defendant would not have time to file delayed motion.
I believe all the services including warning order attorney were properly served according to legal procedure. Is it a normal defence step to dispute the legal service first? Does the defendant want to prove the legal service not correct or just a way to start his defence.
According to your experience, does the defendant has any intention to settle? Or he wants to fight hard and buy time. Will this be a lengthy process from now on? By the way, office of inspector general is collecting evidence. They have interviewed my office clerk and doctor involved. If the civil court needs to show witness or evidence, can the plaintiff cross reference the evidence collected by OIG office (I mean call the OIG investigator to testify his finding)? One DEA office investigator asked me to provide them with a copy of civil complaint. They want to see what charges being filed against the defendant.
Thanks. If the question can be phrased differently, let me know.
Thank you so much for using JustAnswer.com. I truly aim to please you as a customer, but please keep in mind that I do not know what you already know or don't know, or with what you need help, unless you tell me. If I did not answer the question you thought you were asking, please respond with the specific question you wanted answered. PLEASE use REPLY to EXPERT if you would like more information or if you feel something was not included in your answer.
Kindly remember the ONLY WAY experts receive any credit at all for spending time with customers is if you click on OK, GOOD or EXCELLENT SERVICE even though you have made a deposit or are a subscription customer. YOU MUST COMPLETE THE RATING FOR THE EXPERT TO RECEIVE ANY CREDIT, if not the site keeps your money on deposit.
Also remember, sometimes the law does not support what we want it to support, but that is not the fault of the person answering the question, so please be courteous.
PLEASE NOTE WELL WE ARE DEALING WITH LAWS OF 50 STATES PLUS FEDERAL LAWS, AS WELL AS DEALING WITH OTHER CUSTOMERS, SO PLEASE BE PATIENT AND BE ASSURED YOU ARE NOT BEING IGNORED.
There can also be a delay of an hour or more in between my answers because I may be taking a break.
You can always request me through my profile at http://www.justanswer.com/law/expert-paulmjd/ or beginning your question with “For PaulMJD…”
Thanks. After the initial default judgment hearing, the judge gave 20 days for defendant to respond. the judge's letter to defendant says if the defendant failed to respond by March 20, the court is obligated to issue judgement without delay. In fact the default judgement does not come after two weeks. One explaination is clerk's parent was sick and the clerk was off.
Then, after two weeks, the court received the motion from defendant's attorney.
If the defendant's motion says "not properly served" and the court finds otherwise, will the default judgement still move ahead? Why don't the defendant use other reason to file a motion such as disputing fraud charges. Or the only way at this point (after expiraton of Marh 20) is to dispute "not properly served".
The default judgement is set aside at this point.My attorney and his attorney will set a time with judgement chamber for a hearing. I think this is regarding defendant's motion. I guess the defendant can set reason like sick or out of town etc. But I think government investigator may have contacted or met the defendant.
I think the court is likely to grant the motion because of the purpose giving 20 days after the warning order attorney. Does the court have to find anything wrong of the legal service?
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).