Thank you for using JustAnswer. I am researching your issue and will respond shortly.
I'm sorry to hear about your situation. Did the officer think that you should have stopped at the stop sign?
That is, was "15'" back from where you did stop perpendicular with the stop sign?
He did not state that. My assumption, yes. He just stated, I went too far before stopping for the stop sign. His specific and recorded words are yes, you stopped just you went 15' too far before stopping.
No one can see the intersecting road (or cars) to the left as the there is a burm built up at the residence house - on the left.
And to be clear, there's no marked stop line or cross walk?
Correct - No stop line, no cross walk and no side walks on either side of the south bound lane
It's a country road with a hill, a stop sign and then about 15 feet after the stop sign the road to the right intersects and about 18 feet from the stop sign a road intersects to the left
The good thing is that the police officer is on record acknowledging that you stopped. That shows that you were not trying to run the stop sign. The key is to show that you did not break any law.
The law is clear when there is no stop line or cross walk that you shall (i.e. have to) stop at "the point nearest the intersecting roadway where the driver has a view of approaching traffic on the intersecting roadway before entering it." Your reading of the law is correct in that regard.
But essentially you need to plead "not guilty"/
The state has the burden to prove that you violated the law. You don't have the burden to prove that you didn't.
But you can certainly introduce evidence to show that there was no sooner point that you could have stopped.
The key there is to take pictures.
Take pictures from the same height and location of your vehicle directly perpendicular to the stop sign and where you actually stopped.
In these pictures you will want to show the view of the oncoming traffic from your particular viewpoint in your vehicle.
I did plead not guilty. My hearing is today. The video shows me braking going up the hill - passing the stop sign. The officer then proceeds to pull out of the business parking lot and you have me brake and do a quick stop at the intersection
By "hearing", do you mean your actual trial? Or is it a pre-trial hearing, arraignment, etc...?
Did you see my last follow up question?
I'm not sure what you mean. I went before the Judge, He was a Guilty or Not Guilty only. He scheduled a date for me to come in to state what occured.
He asked for a guilty or not guilty only - no other communication
And that date is today, correct?
That would be the arraignment (the guilty/not guilty part).
What time is that hearing?
11 am EST
If at all possible, you should still bring pictures to show that you could not have seen the approaching traffic from the viewpoint of where the police officer said you should have stopped. If the intersecting roadway did not have a stop sign, that would bolster your case (in that a berm would have obstructed speeding vehicles). Again, if possible, go to the place and take pictures, from your vehicle, and get those printed out. I realize that the time limits might make that unfeasible, but if it's something that you can do, you should do it. Get as much information about that intersection as possible (such as whether there is a stop sign for the intersecting road, etc...)
You should also print out the specific code section (which you can find here: http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/4511.43) and take it with you to court so that you can show the judge that this is the law.
Now even if you don't get the pictures (which you should do, if possible) the state still has the burden of proving that you violated the law.
That means that the state would need to prove that you stopped beyond the point where you had a view of approaching traffic on the intersecting roadway.
That means that the state would, at minimum, need to establish where that particular point would be.
It's not enough to say that you didn't stop at exactly at the stop sign (as the law does not require that, but rather stopping at the point nearest the intersecting roadway where you would have a view of the approaching traffic.
So there is no ORC or stated number of feet a person must stop when they pass a stop sign before it is considered a "point of view"
And so it's entirely possible that your defense is that the state did not establish its case beyond a reasonable doubt.
No, particularly if you were charged with this specific provision. Again, the provision says that you need to stop at the stop line, or if there is no stop line, then at the cross walk, but if there is no cross walk, "then at the point nearest the intersecting roadway where the driver has a view of approaching traffic on the intersecting roadway before entering it."
That's fact dependent.
Meaning that what might be true for one stop sign might be false for another.
5 feet beyond might be the case for one stop sign, 10 for another, and directly at the stop sign for a third.
The ultimate issue is where that point "nearest the intersecting roadway where the driver has a view of approaching traffic on the intersecting roadway before entering" is, and whether you stopped at that point or beyond it.
Your defense is that you stopped at that point, and that the state can't prove that you stopped beyond it.
Again, pictures would really help, in that the judge could see what you mean by this.
(from your vehicle, assuming that the police officer did not have the same make and model of that vehicle)
Hope that clears things up a bit. If you have any other questions, please let me know. If not, and you have not yet, please rate my answer. Please note that I don't get any credit for my answer unless and until you rate it a 3, 4, 5 (good or better). Thank you, XXXXX XXXXX luck to you!
Thank you, XXXXX XXXXX go back photo document and print the pics before today's hearing.
My pleasure.If you have any other questions, please let me know. If not, and you have not yet, please rate my answer. Please note that I don't get any credit for my answer unless and until you rate it a 3, 4, 5 (good or better). Thank you, XXXXX XXXXX good luck to you!
Thank you. Can I Save and Exit and establish my rating later
I ask that you rate now (as that will close out the question and allow me to assist other customers), but after rating, you can come back and ask follow up questions (without the need for additional payment, etc..) and I will get to them as soon as I can. There might be a delay if I am assisting other customers at the time or otherwise out of the office, but I will get to your follow up questions ASAP.
Thank you for explaining, I can come back to ask additional questions, without an additional charge. I will rate, now. Thank you.
I forgot to mention, I only had an expired insurance card. The officer is recorded saying he was going to mark that I had it.
Oh, no. I have insurance. I have full coverage. I did not have an insurance card that was not expired, when I was pulled over. He marked down that I did show him proof of insurance.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).