Ask a Lawyer and Get Answers to Your Legal Questions
What is the validity of going against the decision of the judge to reject as evidence a letter of the adjuster (LLC) to the insurance company based on lack of testimony, but stating thta this is a company;s document.. "course of business etc...". I need to collect some more info and will post it here, if it's not clear.I am talking here about the deference rules of the appelate court and so the need to come up with something really well documented.
but to show A's state of mind and provide a motive for committing murder. Does that make sense?It does.However:1. is there not an exception when my request is to introduce record, document, etc.. maintained by a comapny in their ordinary course of business. This document is from the Company of the adjuster, and is part of the business they handled on that claim.2. Is your exception above applicable when my intention was to demonstrate that the palintiff was illegally claiming for a double recovery , his state of mind - ( I did not use that term at the hearing, I just pointed out with that letter the situation in which plaintiff was illegally claiming to both the insurance and the renter if his allegation that i was a renter was valid. One document was admitted as evidence, showing the loss of rent, but the term is abbreviated and even though in my proposed final judgment I have detailed this aspect, the judge has totally ignored thta document. We can detail this later.Therefore the judge validated a fraud by not listening to my testimony ( the document thta was admitted as evidence, but not clearly mentioning loss of rents, and showing the breakdown of the claim release) In addition, the objection of Plaintiff's lawyer is questionable, because it tends to hide the facts originating a fraud,What do you think ?