What is the validity of going against the decision of the judge to reject as evidence a letter of the adjuster (LLC) to the insurance company based on lack of testimony, but stating thta this is a company;s document.. "course of business etc...". I need to collect some more info and will post it here, if it's not clear.I am talking here about the deference rules of the appelate court and so the need to come up with something really well documented.
but to show A's state of mind and provide a motive for committing murder. Does that make sense?It does.However:1. is there not an exception when my request is to introduce record, document, etc.. maintained by a comapny in their ordinary course of business. This document is from the Company of the adjuster, and is part of the business they handled on that claim.2. Is your exception above applicable when my intention was to demonstrate that the palintiff was illegally claiming for a double recovery , his state of mind - ( I did not use that term at the hearing, I just pointed out with that letter the situation in which plaintiff was illegally claiming to both the insurance and the renter if his allegation that i was a renter was valid. One document was admitted as evidence, showing the loss of rent, but the term is abbreviated and even though in my proposed final judgment I have detailed this aspect, the judge has totally ignored thta document. We can detail this later.Therefore the judge validated a fraud by not listening to my testimony ( the document thta was admitted as evidence, but not clearly mentioning loss of rents, and showing the breakdown of the claim release) In addition, the objection of Plaintiff's lawyer is questionable, because it tends to hide the facts originating a fraud,What do you think ?
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).