Yes, this is a residential lease. No, I haven't signed anything since the original agreement in 2005.
Thank you for your follow-up, Karina.In that case you aren't 'screwed' at all, as per your comments. Residential leases are not permitted to be 'self-renewing'. Even a self-renewing clause has to be signed to be valid, so the fact that you haven't signed anything since 2005 makes you an 'at-will' tenant, specifically a 'month-to-month' tenant. So long as you give the landlord 30 days in writing, you are free to leave. And if he refuses to return the security deposit to you without cause, you would be able to take him to court and seek punitive damages of up to 3 times that amount he improperly withheld from your fees. I would also suggest that inform the landlord that you will film the state of the units and explain what was put there by the landlord, and that if he attempts to stick you with the bill, you will contact the city and have them send an inspector for the premises.Good luck.
Not to be picky, but are you very sure that I would be considered month-to-month? The renewal clause was signed with the original lease, just that the other provision of same clause has not been enforced (the rent increase) since the first renewal (rent did increase once). I have been checking around and can't find anything stating that leases need to be re-signed upon renewal here in MD.
MD state Attorney general does say regarding lease renewals:
"An automatic renewal provision in a lease must provide a space for the tenant to give written acknowledgment agreeing to the provision. If the landlord cannot show your signature, initials or witnessed mark acknowledging that provision, the landlord cannot enforce an automatic renewal of the lease."
Since I initialed this space originally in 2005, is it still valid?
Karina,You are not being nit-picky at all. State law governs contracts that require the parties to actively endorse and agree to an extension. In other words, you have to sign something stating that you agree to adhere to an another period under the lease. If you do not sign anything, the agreement automatically turns into a month-to-month agreement if you remain on the premises. That is the position under common law for such agreements, which is why you were not able to find anything about it.Notice that the MD state Attorney states what I have stated, without an endorsement or a signature, the agreement is not binding and you are considered month-to-month. In addition, since the lease was modified (there was no rent increase), you can argue that both parties acted that this was a month-to-month lease since no changes were ever implemented as per under the agreement.Good luck.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).