Hello there and Happy New Year.
When you talked with him and entered into this agreement, did you discuss when he was to give you a deposit or the timing of the payment terms?
Was there anything in writing at all -- emails or anything to set the terms? Or was everything verbal?
Hello again !
Generally speaking, verbal contracts are enforceable in CA for up to 4 years. However, while you most likely had a loose verbal contract with him (which is questionable without having received a deposit from him), there is a rule of contractual performance called "time is of the essence" - basically he was required to take the next step in contractual performance by tendering the deposit in a timely manner and he failed to follow through, thus not completing the next step of the contract and breaching it. You had every right to turn around and sell to someone else who was interested and even if he were to pursue this matter into court he will not win such a case without telephone records showing that he called you and email proof that he actually tried to contact you (which I am sure that he probably did neither of these things but is trying to say this now in an effort to scare you into selling the items to him). I do not think you have anything to worry about here and my suggestion is to mail him the deposit back with a letter stating what I have said here -- that he should have tendered the deposit in a timely fashion to finalize a contract and when he failed to do so you still waited several weeks for him to contact you and when he failed to do so, you sold the items to the next interested party. Send it certified mail so he has to sign for it and if it is returned because he fails to pick it up, send it again via regular mail (and get proof of mailing from the post office -- it costs about 80 cents). Obviously, any person can sue someone else whether they have a case or not, but he will most likely not be able to find a lawyer to handle this and if he does, he would have to pay about $250 an hour to pursue the matter against you in a regular lawsuit setting. In CA he can take a case to small claims court for any amount up to $7500 without using an attorney. Either way, because of the late timeliness of the deposit tender, he failed to follow through in a legally acceptable amount of time therefore breaching any agreement between you - if one even existed to begin with and while you may end up being aggravated by him if he does pursue the matter and it will most likely cause some stress, but I cannot see him actually winning such a claim if he brings the matter to small claims court or a regular lawsuit.
I hope that helps. Please let me know if you have further questions. If not, can you please press the 3rd, 4th or 5th smile face below so that I will be paid for my time. I am paid NOTHING unless you press the 3rd, 4th or 5th smile face below (I do not receive a paycheck -- this is not a hobby - it is how I earn a living in a slow economy at the moment). I really do appreciate your business !! THANK YOU
His "claim" would be for breach of an oral contract and it will be limited to the amount of his actual damages -- which will be the amount of money that you were willing to sell the motors for. The only way that a person can sue for additional compensation and attorneys fees is if the defendant is a large consumer corporation and then he could sue for violations of consumer protection laws, Because you are both private individuals, none of those laws apply here and any claim he makes would be limited to what we call in the law "actual damages" -- meaning what he actually lost. The more you tell me the more it sounds to me like he is simply trying to intimidate you into selling him the motors or paying him money if you do not have the motors any longer (he may even pull this on people all the time as a scam in order to try to scare money out of people as a "settlement" -- this has happened in many states in the not too distant past). Again, I refer you back to my prior answer and suggest that you send him the letter as noted. If he continues to call and harass you simply tell him that you are going to call the police if he does not leave you alone and you can and will charge him with harassment. While I cannot tell you 100% positively that nothing will come of this, the more you tell me here the more it sounds as if it is a scam and he deliberately waited this time in order to try to scare you into giving him money. I suggest that you give him nothing and tell him that he can do whatever he wishes to do and then wait to see what happens here. If he keeps calling you and refuses to stop, then call the police.
Please press the 3rd, 4th or 5th smile face below so that I will be paid for my time. I am paid NOTHING unless you press the 3rd, 4th or 5th smile face below. I really do appreciate your business !! THANK YOU
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).