one is a 10% buyout escrow, next one is the maint. escrow, and the third is insurance deductible. all of them have that saying on them stating that the money in those escrows may also be used towards the truck expenses
it states that the drivers escrow money will be used to pay the repair bill . if there is not enough money in the escrow to pay the bill in full, then the company will deduct money from the drivers paycheck until the repair bill is paid in full the company will apply the additional weekly payments from the drivers paycheck to the repair bill. any money over 500 dollars on the driver's paycheck will be deducted and applied towards the repair bill these deductions will continue consecutively until the repair bill is paid in full
Thank you for your follow-up.So it sounds as if the contract gives the party the choice of whether or not go to escrow funds first, once the first escrow account is used up, and pursue wages, rather than the contract limits the party from first going to the escrow account, THEN go to all the other accounts, and only then go toward wages. There is flexibility and choice, which is probably why they went after the wages first. Unless you can find this progression that I denoted above, and written in a language where the other party must first go toward escrowed funds in the other accounts, their behavior is no illegal. I do not know how the contract is written as I haven't read it, but that is what I suggest that you be on the lookout--if the language is not limiting and not something where it requires a specific action on their part, their behavior, while unsavory, is not illegal. This is also why I asked about all of the escrow accounts, most contracts that have multiple accounts for escrow either deny the ability for the party to go after escrow funds in the other accounts, or give them the choice to do so but not a contractual obligation or requirement.Good luck.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).