A consultant is requesting payment for services rendered as they say "from the goodness of their hearts," while never securing a contract beforehand. I work for a federally funded agency, and NOW the consultant is trying to push a contract through our procurement system and are demanding payment. I am being told by my lead that I should just process the paperwork to pay this consultant. As an honest citizen, I don't see my agency would need to foot the bill when the consultant never saw the importance of following the proper channels to guarantee payment. Is there a law or letter that can me from having to submit to this consultant and my lead?--Especially when funds are tied to the feds.
Thank you for the post, I am happy to assist you by answering your questions. Regrettably you are bound by the directive of your lead, whom may be acquiescing to the consultant's payment request for fear of a lawsuit. The consultant can claim that the work performed was rendered in light of the parties prior course of dealing or implied contract. Further, if your agency was aware of the services being performed in expectation of payment and failed to stop the consultant, the consultant can argue unjust enrichment. Please let me know if you need additional guidance.
So does this mean that even an implication of a contract can justify payment, although a scope of work was never submitted, or contract approved? And to boot, these are federal funds--or does this have no relevance? If there were ever to be an audit, couldn't I get in trouble for using federal funds to pay for consultant services after-the-fact?
Yes, from your description your lead is trying to avoid a lawsuit which ultimately can be more costly than just paying the consultant. You are not using federal funds, you are considered to be a subordinate and following the direction of your lead whom can make the determination that the contract can be retroactively executed to pay the consultant.
Are you able to elaborate on your rating? I know that you want an accurate and truthful answer, but your rating implies that you want me to tell you want to hear and short of that, you will rate the answer negatively. Is this the case?
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).