Thank you so much for this opportunity to try and be of service to you today.
Wisdom...compassion..empathy. These are more than words for me. They are my promise to you.
I am a licensed attorney and registered nurse. I will do my best to provide you an honest and accurate answer to your important legal question.
QUESTION: "Can they do that??"
ANSWER: First of all, I am so very sorry for your circumstances and I mean every word of that remark. Here is how this works. You are up against a most nasty little animal called the "substantial evidence rule". Rather than having to meet the "beyond a reasonable doubt" (criminal) or even "preponderance of the evidence" (civil) standard, all the agency has to demonstrate is that its decisions are based upon "substantial evidence in the record". But, the word "substantial" is highly misleading. In practical application, it means a "scintilla" or a "mere speck", so as long as there is some little basis (i.e. in your former employer's files), the agency (see comments below) will rule against you. It is just an awfully hard hurdle to overcome. Not impossible, but a challenge even for experienced administrative litigation counsel. I regret sounding perhaps a bit discouraging, but rather than doing you the disservice of misleading you, I have gone head and spoken candidly. I respect you too much to do otherwise, frankly, although again I do have every sympathy for your circumstances. All of this applies to the actual medical board (agency), whereas peer review is afforded even more latitude and discretion. So, the botXXXXX XXXXXne and truthful answer to your inquiry, as much as I personally do not like this aspect of the law, is "yes". I would love to say otherwise, but I just respect you too much to do you the disservice of misleading you or providing false information, even when the means being the bearer of entirely correct although admittedly discouraging news.
I truly hope all works out for you.
If you would like any additional information or have more questions please do not hesitate to ask! Please remember to only rate my answer when you are 100% satisfied. If you feel the need to click either "Bad Service" or "Poor Service", please stop and reply to me via the REPLY button (not RELIST) with the issue you have. I will be happy to continue further and do everything I can to provide you with the service you seek. In rating my work, please realize that I am merely the messenger, meaning I do not write the laws and can only report them to you. Placing a BONUS is a nice way of expressing appreciation and will be most gratefully appreciated to allow me to continue helping customers!
Join thousands of satisfied customers by adding me to your bookmarks/favorites: Just type your future question in the text box to direct it to my personal attention.
Hello again,Thanks for writing back -- good to hear from you.
You are quite welcome -- my pleasure to be of some service!I will be glad to comment further -- please see below.
Kindly just let me know if you are having any problem with submitting your favorable rating (acceptance) of my answer on the honor system. I would be glad to help out if so or ask our support team for assistance if needed. I mention this only because I have seen some confusion and the last thing I want is to see you encounter any frustration.
QUESTION: "However, I find it hard to believe that a hospital can impose that you have to see a certai psychologist that is on the hospital payroll especially when I had 2 idenpendant evaluations from a psychologist and psychiatrist."
ANSWER: Personally, I agree. Please understand, I am on your side here, no arguments, I have seen worthy colleagues just shredded by the process. But, it does not change the law. If you will permit me an admittedly simple medical analogy. A patient says to you: "Doctor, I just can't believe that my cigarette smoking played a role in my pulmonary disease. I refuse to accept it." Well, alright, the patient is certainly entitled to his or her own opinion, but it does not change the medical evidence. Likewise, under the currently existing law (as it stands, not as I wish it were), the committee is allowed to do so and there is no privacy law violation. It is lousy, you bet, but I have spoken candidly rather than providing you with a bogus "happy" answer in hope of scoring a favorable rating. I would rather you have the truthful reality than some meaningless yet hopeful sounding pablum.
Take care and thanks again for choosing our service!Join thousands of satisfied customers by adding me to your bookmarks/favorites: LawInfoNow. Just type your future question in the text box to direct it to my personal attention.
Hello again,Thanks for writing back -- good to hear from you.
I have opted out (without charge). My fellow legal expert colleagues are able to view your question and answer in their discretion.
Due to a feature of the computer system (nothing to do with you as a customer), there may be a delay until you see my "official" opt out actually indicated as such.
It was a pleasure interacting with you. I would like to wish you all the best and truly hope you see this matter resolved.
Take care and thanks again for choosing our service!
[Please do not reply to this post as doing so will delay handling of your inquiry.]
Applying the above-described law to your facts, the issue boils down to whether or not the use of a particular expert evaluation is reasonable in establishing an effective record for purposes of peer review, and then whether or not the decision made by the peer review board is erroneous based upon the record of the review board.
The law does not require any particular review procedure. However, it is reasonable to assume that a process which does not comport with some sort of "due process" typical of an arbitration or court hearing is likely to produce some skepticism and scrutiny on the part of a court. Moreover, failure to follow the hospital peer review guidelines (or "bylaws" as you characterize them), would violate due process and likely produce a reversal.
BotXXXXX XXXXXne, you have two different approaches that you can take:
1. You can contest the process of peer review as arbitrary and capricious and/or not in accordance with the hospital's bylaws.
2. You can contest the purported facts produced in the peer-review record.
What you cannot do, in my opinion, is simply refuse to cooperate in the investigation. This may seem to be an invasion of your privacy, but as I'm sure you're aware, mental health expert opinions vary considerably, and there is always an expert who will take the other side of an argument.
This leads to your final recourse. If there is a record of your expert's evaluation in the record, and it differs from the board's expert, then you have an appeal to the court on grounds that the decision is not supported by the evidence, because there is no definitive outcome. And, if your expert's opinions are not allowed into the record then you have an appeal to the court on grounds that the board's procedure is arbitrary and capricious, because the board chooses to exclude expert opinion without any finding of incompetence on the part of the witness or the evaluation.
Please let me know if I can clarify or assist you further. NOTICE: My goal here is to entertain while educating the public about the law. I hope my answer is useful and informative to you. During our conversation, the website may ask you to rate my answer. If you rate my answer lower than the middle rating, then the website retains your entire payment, and I receive nothing. It is entirely your choice as to how you rate my answer. However, because your payment to me is in the nature of a donation/gift, rather than as compensation for any services rendered, you are entitled to know how your rating affects the final distribution of your donation. If you need to contact me again, please put my user id at the beginning of your question ("ToCustomer), and the system will send me an alert. Please Click the following link for IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION. Thanks and best wishes!
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).