How JustAnswer Works:

  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.

Ask Law Pro Your Own Question

Law Pro
Law Pro, Attorney
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 23751
Experience:  20 years legal practitioner: real estate, collections, estate, civil, business, and criminal law
11688690
Type Your Legal Question Here...
Law Pro is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

Can you explain this to me.. subject to provisions under rule

Resolved Question:

Can you explain this to me.. subject to provisions under rule 16 of pretrial order The court may permit withdrawal or ammendment of the admissions hen the presentation of the merits of the action will be subserved thereby and the party who obtains the admission fails to satisfy the court that withdrawal or amendment will prejudice that partyin maintaining the action or defense on merits ?
Submitted: 2 years ago.
Category: Legal
Expert:  Law Pro replied 2 years ago.
What that rule is basically saying is - that the court upon your motion may allow for the amendment or withdrawal (even allow you to file out of time) of admissions when the judge thinks there is good cause to do so.

Generally, you have to file a motion to ask the court what you want them to do as to your "admissions".

In your case - allow you to file your answers/responses out of time.

"merits" in law means - This word is used principally in matters of defense of civil actions. A defense upon the merits, is one that rests upon the justice of the cause, and not upon technical grounds only (that time restraints within which to file your pleadings by is just a technicality) ; there is, therefore, a difference between a good defense, which may be technical or not, and a defense on the merits.

Everyone realizes in the legal profession that an attorney can keep the other side bottled up for years with litigation - motions, pleadings, discovery requests, depositions, etc.

That is the technical procedural process of the law and litigation.

That just because you didn't file your responses (answers and objections) to their requests for admissions on time you are thereby "prejudiced" when you have a "meritorious" defense.

Prejudiced - disadvantaged, unjust, unfair, inequitable

Merits - the actual and intrinsic rights and wrongs of an issue, esp in a law case, as distinct from extraneous matters and technicalities

Every time a judge makes a ruling - someone is prejudiced thereby.

However, it would be "unjust" in inequitable and place you at a disadvantage not to be able to file your responses to the requests for admissions out of time - although the opposition may be prejudiced it's not unjust or inequitable for the judge to allow you to do such especially when you have a meritorious cause of action.

It's a tough argument - that basically you have to argue to the court that you have a defense to the plaintiff cause of action and if not allowed to file your responses to their requests for admissions upon a mere technicality - it's unjust and patently unfair.

So you have to explain in your motion why you didn't file your responses on time (giving a good reason - merely forgot isn't good enough - you must have been under a false impression or someone was in the hospital or something).

Then you have to attach your responses to the request for admissions to the motion as an exhibit for the judge to be able to view them.

Then you can point to some of your responses to the requests for admission while arguing before the judge giving examples of what your meritorious defense is to the plaintiff's action.

It's not an easy endeavor to do all this and make the argument. What's in your favor is that you're pro se - judges usually bend over backwards for pro se litigants.


So that's it in a nutshell.




Please ask for "Law Pro" if you have any further future questions!

Just Answer is a "PAY FOR SERVICE" Website. Please press the GREEN ACCEPT BUTTON so I will receive credit for assisting you (even if you placed a deposit or have a subscription program). You may continue to ask follow-up questions after accepting. If the information is helpful, I would very much appreciate positive feedback. Bonuses are also appreciated. If you do have a follow-up question, press REPLY, NOT relist, or else I won’t receive the question.

Law Pro, Attorney
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 23751
Experience: 20 years legal practitioner: real estate, collections, estate, civil, business, and criminal law
Law Pro and 3 other Legal Specialists are ready to help you
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
So would being pro se and misunderstanding the ramifications of not responding be good enough. If I can argue the exhibits they have hold no weight and the plaintiff cannot win with the documents they have presented? There is no contractual agreement and the bill of sale for the debt has nothing in the body of it that states they purchased a debt that belonged to me. That the only way they can win is waiting for a technical default?
Expert:  Law Pro replied 2 years ago.
No, doubtful - you need to give a better excuse as I stated. Misunderstanding the ramifications isn't a very good excuse - in fact a very poor excuse.

Arguing that the exhibits are irrelevant and that plaintiff cannot prove their allegations with the documents submitted - that's good.

That's a good argument as to the "merits" - but you need a better excuse as to why you didn't respond.

DO NOT use that you didn't understand the ramification of not responding - better to say your computer was down or your printer was broken or internet wasn't working because of your router problems. Something beyond your control.

I like that statement that the only way they can win is waiting and hoping for a technical default.

I'm not sure of the facts of your case - but it would appear that they need to prove:

1) a valid contract

2) a valid assignment of the contract to them

3) breach of contract, and

4) damages



Please ask for "Law Pro" if you have any further future questions!

Just Answer is a "PAY FOR SERVICE" Website. Please press the GREEN ACCEPT BUTTON so I will receive credit for assisting you (even if you placed a deposit or have a subscription program). You may continue to ask follow-up questions after accepting. If the information is helpful, I would very much appreciate positive feedback. Bonuses are also appreciated. If you do have a follow-up question, press REPLY, NOT relist, or else I won’t receive the question.
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
OMG...My computer did go down and I can prove it . So can I say my computer went down and since I couldn't research how to respond I didn't understand the ramifications? The reason I am saying that is because I put in a statement my interpretation was that by not responding I was under the impression this case would move to trial. And all they have as exhibits is an alleged account summary and a bill of sale for a computer excel file. After this response I'll accept and if I have any other questions I will ask a new one. Thanks so much
Expert:  Law Pro replied 2 years ago.
It's something that the court can hang their hat on - that they don't unfairly prejudice or penalize the opposing party - by giving you the ability to then file your responses to their requests for admissions.

Do not say you didn't understand the ramifications - that shoots you in the foot.

Say you couldn't respond because your computer was down - you only have one computer and all your information is on that computer (which is why you couldn't use someone else's computer).

Say you wanted and planned on filing a response but couldn't because of the problem.

Definitely point out the deficiencies of their alleged evidence and say that by not responding to their requests for admissions - that evidence is now admitted which is unjust because the evidence is not evidence of anything.


Please ask for "Law Pro" if you have any further future questions!

Just Answer is a "PAY FOR SERVICE" Website. Please press the GREEN ACCEPT BUTTON so I will receive credit for assisting you (even if you placed a deposit or have a subscription program). You may continue to ask follow-up questions after accepting. If the information is helpful, I would very much appreciate positive feedback. Bonuses are also appreciated. If you do have a follow-up question, press REPLY, NOT relist, or else I won’t receive the question.

JustAnswer in the News:

 
 
 
Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... Justanswer.com.
JustAnswer.com...has seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like justanswer.com/legal
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.
 
 
 

What Customers are Saying:

 
 
 
  • Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises! Gary B. Edmond, OK
< Last | Next >
  • Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises! Gary B. Edmond, OK
  • My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer. Eric Redwood City, CA
  • I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight. Michael Wichita, KS
  • PaulMJD helped me with questions I had regarding an urgent legal matter. His answers were excellent. Three H. Houston, TX
  • Anne was extremely helpful. Her information put me in the right direction for action that kept me legal, possible saving me a ton of money in the future. Thank you again, Anne!! Elaine Atlanta, GA
  • It worked great. I had the facts and I presented them to my ex-landlord and she folded and returned my deposit. The 50 bucks I spent with you solved my problem. Tony Apopka, FL
  • Not only did he answer my Michigan divorce question but was also able to help me out with it, too. I have since won my legal case on this matter and thank you so much for it. Lee Michigan
 
 
 

Meet The Experts:

 
 
 
  • Tina

    Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    8436
    JD, BBA Over 25 years legal and business experience.
< Last | Next >
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/MU/multistatelaw/2011-11-27_173951_Tinaglamourshotworkglow102011.64x64.jpg Tina's Avatar

    Tina

    Lawyer

    Satisfied Customers:

    8436
    JD, BBA Over 25 years legal and business experience.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/RA/ratioscripta/2012-6-13_2955_foto3.64x64.jpg Ely's Avatar

    Ely

    Counselor at Law

    Satisfied Customers:

    19941
    Private practice with focus on family, criminal, PI, consumer protection, and business consultation.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/FL/FLAandNYLawyer/2012-1-27_14349_3Fotolia25855429M.64x64.jpg FiveStarLaw's Avatar

    FiveStarLaw

    Attorney

    Satisfied Customers:

    8189
    25 years of experience helping people like you.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/jespoag/2008-12-17_222355_jessepic.jpg JPEsq's Avatar

    JPEsq

    Attorney

    Satisfied Customers:

    2132
    Experience as general attorney, in house counsel, SSDI, Family Law attorney, and law professor
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/gsenmartin/2008-04-22_214950_me1.jpg Guillermo J. Senmartin, Esq.'s Avatar

    Guillermo J. Senmartin, Esq.

    Attorney

    Satisfied Customers:

    110
    7+ years of experience handling various legal matters.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/PA/PaulmoJD/2013-10-10_195858_JAImage.64x64.jpg Law Educator, Esq.'s Avatar

    Law Educator, Esq.

    Attorney

    Satisfied Customers:

    31621
    JA Mentor -Attorney Labor/employment, corporate, sports law, admiralty/maritime and civil rights law
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/dkaplun/2009-05-17_173121_headshot_1_2.jpg Dimitry K., Esq.'s Avatar

    Dimitry K., Esq.

    Attorney

    Satisfied Customers:

    15975
    Multiple jurisdictions, specialize in business/contract disputes, estate creation and administration.