How do strict liability cases differ from other types of tort
cases? When can a person or company be held strictly liable for an injury? Do you think strict liability is fair?
My teacher says after completing the lesson that he has devised the question from, I should be able to:
define the three different categories of torts and be able to determine when each should apply
distinguish between different types of intentional torts and know what must happen for each type of intentional tort to apply
explain the elements of negligence, including duty of care, breach of duty, causation, and damages
explain the different types of damages a jury awards in tort cases
So if any of that can tie into the answer, that would be great. Also, please try and use examples. Thanks.