Good morning and happy new years
That outside accounting is routinely done, and failure to permit it can be basis for voting board members out
it is not actionable on its own unless there is a showing that the board has been mismanaging or usurping funds, unless the bylaws and internal rules call for such an outside review
If they do, and the board refuses, and funds have been segregated for this purpose, the conduct is illegal and actionable
Before a lawsuit is even considered, a lawyer letter to the board with a cc to residents often accomplishes the outcome you are seeking.
That is not the issue. Members of an Association can always vote out Board members with or without good reason.
The issue is the following:
1. Given that the law requires outside accountants to do some verifying of an Association's affairs, and
2. Given that at least sometimes, they verify nothing except to affirm that based on what information they were given the financial statements are in order., and
3. Given that absent a statement that internal contriols are in place and have been verified by the outside accountant the unit owners can have no assurance that there has not been fraud or waste, and
4. Given that the Board members have a fiduciary duty to the unit owners,
5. The question becomes: Can Board members refuse to authorize relativley minimal payments to the accountants to do their dure diligence on internal controls without being in violation of their fiduciary obligations?
There are many cynics who are convinced that every manager is a thief and every condo is being mismanaged. Some of these cynics are in this building.
I have a less cynical view, but I believe one can trust but never stop verifying, if only to correct good faith errors.
To anser your question specifically: Yes there has almost certainly been some fraud and mismanagement. However the question remains generic:
Regardless of any suspicion or reason to believe any wrongdoing has occurred , I believe the principle of paying outside auditors to verify internal controls to prevent wrongdoing is an essential fiduciary duty of every Board Member of every Florda Association. Consequently I also believe that refusing to do in the name of saving money, when the money saved is such an insignificant part ot the total cost of the Association budget is a clear breach of the fiduciary duty of the Board Member. Do you agree?
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).