Have Legal Questions? Ask a Lawyer Now.
Acquaintances who are also not attorneys, but have helped others. One case being a business owner against her city's attempt at eminent domain with a very low monetary offer. These people helped her get much more, commensurate with the actual value of her property.
It is supposed to be a means to litigate and win in constitutional issues.
Yes. But, I think we are also going to sue them personally under the Civil Rts Act of 1965, section 1983. (I think that's the right section number.)
Thank you for your help!
I have never heard of such a required letter. There are notices of claim that can be required but those generally involve personal injury actions based on the sovereign immunity waiver of a state contained in its torts claim act. However, suing a state for violation of federal rights do not implicate the state's sovereign immunity waiver so I do not know of any prior notice requirement. If there is a continuing act of which you complain, you should make a demand to cease before filing the suit unless you are up against a statute of limitations.
This communication is not intended as legal advice. A local attorney should always be consulted for legal advice. No client/attorney relationship is intended or created by this communication.
Thank you for your response. I had to read it several times to make sure I understood without having to ask another question. I wasn't sure about the state's "sovereign immunity waiver." I think I get it. We are filing a notice of claim demand under a state statute. I am assuming we can file under it AND under violation of federal rights. If so, as I understand you, the separate notice in the form of "presumptive letter" or any other name, is not something we need to do, whether it is against section 1983, or just stating the constitutional violations. If I do understand, it helps me to be confident that I haven't omitted a requirement prior to the filing. There is a statute of limitations - at least, there is a 180 day time limit for filing the cause against the statutory violations. Hopefully, I do understand and can proceed more confidently from here.
If this sounds like I may not get it and don't know it (!), a further response would be appreciated. Otherwise, I thank you very much for your help. Itasca
If you are suing under state statutes that is where you are dealing with the state's sovereign immunity and you need your notice of claim and you should include the federal claim in the notice not just the state claims.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).