Unfortunately if the statement was not also a written statement, then it would be unenforceable as anything to do with a property purchase has to be in writing to be binding. This is under the "four corners doctrine" which states that that entire contract and all terms are contained within the "four corners" of the document. There is also a doctrine called the "statute of frauds" which also states that any contract regarding the sale of property must be in writing to be enforceable.
I know this is not the news you had hoped for.
I would like to clarify that I was the developer, not the purchaser. I have since sold the development and am in the process of canceling the Contract for Deed due to the fact that the purchaser has been in default for two years.
Thank you for your response
Ok, as long as the statement wasn't in writing, the purchaser would have to provide evidence of fraud or misrepresentation to have a chance at winning any suit. But if the realtor denys making any false promises and instead only engaged in "puffery" (talking up a sale), then I don't see any cause of action that would succeed. Assuming that the realtor denied making the statement, it would be a he said/she said argument unless there were uninterested witnesses (non family) who could confirm that the statement was made.
But even if the realtor did admit making the statement, unless you told them to actively misrepresent the property, the purchaser's action would lie against the realtor for fraud and misrepresentation, not you. Even if the realtor said something like the entire development will be done in 6 months and that turned out not to be true due to market conditions, that is not misrepresentation if the realtor had every reason to believe in the truth of the statement at the time it was made. The realtor has a fiduciary duty to you as your agent if they were representing you as the seller to not do anything against your interests and if they actively lied to a purchaser, that would be a breach of their duty to you and the purchaser and either of you could hold them liable for any damages.
That doesn't mean that they can't sue and have you have to defend as anyone can sue anybody for just about anything. It just means that they likely won't win.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).