DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT
Comes now the defendant, [Leigh Westbrook], by and through undersigned
counsel, and hereby files their motion to vacate foreclosure judgment, pursuant to Rules
1.540(b) Fla. R. Civ. P., states:
1. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b) provides in pertinent part:
On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or a
party’s legal representative from a final judgment, decree, order, or proceeding
for the following reasons:… (3) fraud (whether heretofore denominated intrinsic
or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party; (4) that
the judgment or decree is void; This rule does not limit the power of a court to
entertain an independent action to relieve a party from a judgment, decree, order,
or proceeding or to set aside a judgment or decree for fraud upon the court.
2. The plaintiff ’s complaint fails to contain sufficient facts to establish who the
plaintiff is and its relationship to the defendant and to the claim for foreclosure of a
promissory note, including the date of the alleged assignment of the mortgage and note, and
the identity of the owner of the subject promissory note. The complaint fails to sufficiently
identify who the plaintiff is and fails to allege facts sufficient to determine the standing of
3. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.130(a) provides in pertinent part: “All bonds,
notes, bills of exchange, contracts, accounts, or documents upon which action may be
brought or defense made, or a copy thereof or a copy of the portions thereof material to
the pleadings, shall be incorporated in or attached to the pleading.”
4. Plaintiff attaches documents to its complaint that conflict with the allegations of
material facts in the complaint in which the plaintiff claims that it “owns the Note” and
Mortgage by virtue of an unrecorded assignment that does not allege when the assignment
occurred. These allegations conflict with the mortgage attached to the complaint that
identifies [name original mortgagee], as the lender with the security interest. These
allegations therefore constitute serious misrepresentations and could be construed as a fraud
upon the court.
5. Additionally plaintiff makes allegations in its complaint that conflict with the
documents attached thereto as to who owned the subject note at the time the note was
6. When exhibits are inconsistent with the plaintiff ’s allegations of material fact as to
whom the real party in interest is, such allegations cancel each other out. Fladell v. Palm Beach
County Canvassing Board, 772 So.2d 1240 (Fla. 2000); Greenwald v. Triple D Properties, Inc., 424
So. 2d 185, 187 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Costa Bella Development Corp. v. Costa Development Corp.,
441 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1983).
7. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.130(b) provides in pertinent part: “Any exhibit
attached to a pleading shall be considered a part thereof for all purposes.” Because the facts
revealed by Plaintiff ’s exhibit are inconsistent with Plaintiff ’s allegations as to its ownership
of the subject note and mortgage, those allegations are neutralized and Plaintiff ’s complaint
is rendered objectionable. Greenwald v. Triple D Properties, Inc., 424 So. 2d 185, 187 (Fla.
4th DCA 1983).
Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.210(a) provides in pertinent part:
“Every action may be prosecuted in the name of the real party in
interest, but a personal representative, administrator, guardian, trustee
of an express trust, a party with whom or in whose name a contract
has been made for the benefit of another, or a party expressly
authorized by statute may sue in that person’s own name without
joining the party for whose benefit the action is brought.”
9. The Plaintiff in this action meets none of those criteria. Because the exhibit
attached to Plaintiff ’s complaint is inconsistent with Plaintiff ’s allegations as to ownership of
the subject promissory note and mortgage, Plaintiff has failed to establish itself as the real
party in interest and has failed to state a cause of action.
10. In Florida, the prosecution of a foreclosure action is by the owner and holder of
the mortgage and the note. Your Construction Center, Inc. v. Gross, 316 So. 2d 596 (Fl. 4th DCA
11. The Defendants recognize the precedent set in WM Specialty Mortgage, LLC v.
Salmon, 874 So.2d 680 (Fla 4th DCA 2004) regarding the assignment of a mortgage. However
as the Second District Court of Appeals noted, standing requires that the party prosecuting
the action have a sufficient stake in the outcome and that the party bringing the claim be
recognized in the law as being a real party in interest entitled to bring the claim as of the
date of the commencement of the action. The plaintiff ’s failure to meet the standing
requirements as of the commencement of this foreclosure action renders the complaint
fatally defective and, therefore constitutes misrepresentation as to who the Plaintiff really is.
The assignment cannot post date the filing of this action if assignment does not relate back
to the commencement of the litigation. Progressive Express Insurance Company v. McGrath
Community Chiropractic, 913 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2005).
12. The Plaintiff, in its complaint alleges that it “owns the Note and Mortgage”
however it has failed to produce any material evidence to support its claim. In the absence of
this evidence the Plaintiff is clearly misrepresenting themselves as the real party in interest
and the holder in due course with legal standing to bring this cause of action against the
13. The Plaintiff alleges that it is the holder in due course on the subject mortgage
and note yet it is the belief of the Defendant that the note was part of larger securitization
process and sold to several un-named parties and beneficial owners and any claims by
Plaintiff, in the absence of the original note endorsed to Plaintiff, are a clear
misrepresentation of the actual facts.
14. It is the position of the Defendant that if the courts were to allow a Plaintiff to
bring a cause of action in a scenario where the Plaintiff alleges that it owns a certain note
and mortgage but fails to provide any evidence to the courts that this, in fact true, the courts
would open the door to incredible harm to any homeowner whose home is secured by a
15. If the court were to allow the Plaintiff in this case to prevail in light of serious
misrepresentation and fraud upon the court, it would result in a major injustice to the
Defendant. The Court cannot be in a position of enabling Plaintiff and its attorneys to
commit material misrepresentation or felony crimes.
WHEREFORE, Defendant requests this court grant Defendant’s motion for
vacating judgment and for all other relief to which these defendants prove themselves
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served via
regular U.S. Mail to: XXXXX XXXXX ADDRESS on this XXth day of XXXXX,
THen we file an Appeal with the Appeal court that the Lower Court didn't honor our Discovery, motions, and Pleadings. Correct
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).