Based on your alleged facts, his probability of increasing parenting time is effectively nil (0%). Courts want to see how the child's best interests are served by an increase in parenting time. Your facts reveal nothing that would support a modifcation.
However, to be fair, you may want to try to look at things from your ex's viewpoint, because the judge doesn't know anything more than he/she is told in court. So, if you are telling me your beliefs, rather than the objective facts, then my analysis will be completely wrong.
BotXXXXX XXXXXne, it's all about the child and stability. But, the court can only rule on evidence presented, so if you want to matain the status quo, then you need to have evidence to support that everything is just fine in the child's life, and changing things are likely distress the child.
Hope this helps.
Terms and Conditions: By your continuing in this conversation with me, or by your clicking “Accept”, you are expressly agreeing to all of the following: (1) our communication is for entertainment purposes only; (2) you are not consulting me in my professional capacity as an attorney; (3) you do not seek to establish an attorney-client relationship with me, nor do I with you; (4) you will not rely on anything I say and you will obtain appropriate legal counsel via a traditional/office consultation with an attorney licensed to practice in the jurisdiction where your legal issue arises (and you may not use our communication to avoid taxpayer penalties imposed by the U.S. Dept. of Treasury); (5) by communicating with me in this public forum you are irrevocably waiving any right to privacy, confidentiality and attorney-client privilege concerning the matters discussed. You further separately declare that any payment made by you is not consideration for this contract, nor offered for any services rendered by me on your behalf, but rather is made in genuine admiration and respect for my desire to help others. If you do not agree with these terms and conditions, then you must advise me immediately.
Yes. You're thinking like a lawyer now, and the judge will appreciate some objectivity. Sometimes it's useful to sit through a few hours of hearings with the judge who will hear your case (yes, I know, you can't take time off from work to hang out at the courthouse, but it's still a good idea if you can do it). Most of the custody wars are pure "he-said, she-said," and the judge has heard every BS story that anyone could sling.
In the rare instance that a litigant comes in and doesn't denegrate the other parent's morals, or makes unsubstantiated claims, the judge will probably fall off his/her chair.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).