Thousands of verified Experts are ready to answer your specific questions 24/7.
Satisfaction is guaranteed and you pay your Expert only if you are satisfied.
Just type your detailed question and click "Get an Answer."
In minutes you'll get a response from an Expert. You can always ask follow-up questions.
Happy with your answer? Just click "Accept" to pay your Expert.
Plaintiff and defendent both represents themselves pro se in a motion hearing (failure to pay) and are incompetent. Judge dismiss the case due to insufficient evidence and says next time you decide to come to court over this issue bring an attorney. Do the defendant and plaintiff have to hire one? Is that an order? How about 6 years later can they represent themself(ves) as pro-se with a unbundled legal service and better preparation revisiting the same subject but now on child support modification (not failure to pay)?
State/Country relating to Question: New Mexico
hi
that is not an order of the court. it is a stern admonishment and suggestion. the judge is showing his low tolerance for the wasting of the court's time. so, if they do go back they better be well prepared if they want the judge to take them seriously. of course, it could be a new judge - but they would not want to wasting the court's time again.
Attorney at Law
20 years practicing law