Hello and thanks for choosing Just Answer®. I am a licensed attorney, and I will be glad to try and assist you.
To provide you with accurate information, could you please clarify this point so I can best address your inquiry:
I think I am understanding your plan correctly, but I just want to confirm one point. Have you already tried to compel the defendant (through Discovery) to produce a copy of the canceled check?
Once I hear back from you, I will be glad to let you know my answer. There may be some delay as I am assisting other customers or am away from my computer. Please rest assured, however, that I will get back to you as soon as possible.
The defendent did produce the copy of the front of the check on the first day of court. She explained to the judge that the bank could not locate the back of the check because of damaged microfish. The judge gave her 30 days to get the back of the check she claimed she paid me with. She then in 30 days produced to the court a back copy of a prior cancelled check that she had paid me with. The judge then re scheduled 30 days for me to prove it was a different check. I have that evidence that the back of the cancelled check she produced to the court was payment for a prior invoice. I also have evidence from my bank of all trasactions of biz done with her. I have collected copy of front and back of every cancelled check she has payed me with, along with the deposit slip the check was listed on and the original concurring bank statement with those deposits. This is important because they are all numbered by a bank clearing house.
The defendent has also produced a single page photo copy of her bank statement showing where the check in question has cleared her bank. This has been forged, but I can't prove it. If I accuse her of forgery the judge will throw me out. I will look bad for even making the accusation, but a fifth grader can tell it is a fake, because it has been photo copied so many times that the fine print is elligible.
The only other thing I could think of doing to disprove her is to subpeona a copy of the front and back of the check myself. On my subpeona duce tecum I reasonably request her bank to produce a microfish copy front and back of the check in question and nothing else. I figured she has produced a fake of it to the court anyway and she would not be able to quash my request.
Hello and thanks so much for choosing this forum to pose your important legal question. I will do my best to give you some honest and accurate guidance as I answer your question.
I hope that this information has been helpful to you. If we can be of any further assistance please free to use our service again. Best wishes for a successful outcome.
If my answer has been helpful to you, please click "ACCEPT" so that I may be paid. This is the only way that I will receive compensation for the work performed. Please consider clicking "BONUS" as a nice way of saying "thanks" for a job well done. Clicking "FEEDBACK" to leave your positive comments is always greatly appreciated.
The information provided is general in nature only and should not be construed as legal advice. By using this forum, you acknowledge that no attorney-client relationship has been created between you and Benjamin M. Burt, Jr., Esq. You should always consult with a lawyer in your state.
Thanks so much Ben!!!!! Sorry took awhile to reply, but you provided me with alot of great reading material. LOL...... This will be a big help and thanks again.
You are quite welcome. It was entirely my pleasure to be of some help.
Many thanks for your "Accept" and especially your kind words. Both are greatly appreciated.
Take care and thanks again for using JustAnswer®.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).