Have Legal Questions? Ask a Lawyer Now.
Did the consumer receive a false check they deposited?
Who ordered the funds sent by electronic transfer?
A third party, all I knew way was that it was supposed to be payment to a man I was involved with thru the internet in one of those love things. He is out of the country and they told me that a company he was doing business for was trying to send him money but that they needed someone that he knew to transfer the money to him and I being a trusting woman let them wire money into my chase acct. I then took the money out and sent it western union to Nigeria, were he is. We did the normal 5 day external transfer and the pretend deposits and wiated the 5 days and the money came from wells fargo and I proceeded to send tit to nigeria. But then about a week later, the transfers got reversed. No one has really told me why, but now I owe chase bank $20,000. and I cant get anyone to answer me at the phone number is XXXXX given and so basically, im screwed
Unfortunately, you may have been the victim of a crime but FDIC insurance cannot help. FDIC insurance is meant to insure deposits for persons if the bank fails, not, against criminal theft or loss (see here). Also, wire transfer agreements often make the consumer liable if a transfer of funds is not covered by a consumer's account. Consumers are normally held responsible (if the actual provider of forged funds is not captured) for any loss a bank may incur if it transfers funds based on a deposit that does not have money behind it (just because a check clears does not mean there are funds behind that check to make the deposit real). Victims of such crimes may report their situation to the Internet Crime Complaint Center here which is partnered with the FBI.
Concerning my question, When this occured, why wasnt the bank or I given any information, from Wells Fargo,as why this had happened> It seems to me, that before the second or third transfer was made, someone from Wells Fargo, would have noticed something wasnt right and informed Chase as to a problem.
One other question, cacn Chase charge me late fees and overdraft penalties, when I am the one who alerted them to the situation?
If it can be shown that a bank was negligent, for example, that a transfer was clearly, on its face, fraudulent or otherwise improper, then they may be held liable. However, courts have determined that banks cannot be held liable to check or verify that every deposit or transfer to assure it is proper because of the volume of transactions they do every day, so negligence tends to be found only were something is so obvious or clearly wrong that any reasonable banker would have normally detected it.
When persons undertake to conduct deposits and transfers from their accounts they normally enter into bank agreements that indicate that if any problems arise through which a customer ends up owing a bank money that the account will have late fees and overdraft penalties charged. Normally, this is provided in the package consumers receive when they open accounts at banks. If such fees are not added in violation of such agreements then they are normally allowed. However, sometime banks may be willing to forgo such charges if they and a consumer can agree to an arrangement.
so, over the course of the few weeks that this was going on,i mean, wouldnt that be long enough for wells fargo to realize something was wong. and wouldnt it be their responsibility to at least notify Chase concerning the matter. When I talked to the manager at Chase, she informed me that she had never heard anything from Wells Fargo, concerning the matter
Not necessarily. It normally takes a few days, at least, once a transaction first takes place, for the automated payment systems to move through their collection practices and notify and then notice that there are or are not funds available. Then the process can work its way, slowly, from bank to bank searching for the funds. Also, where international banks and payment systems are involved there may be even more time before a final realization is made that a transfer has no funds behind it. Moreover, the system are automated, going by account numbers, routing numbers, etc., meaning that it would be unlikely that a particular bank branch worker would know about something until a customer, after being contacted by the corporation, tells them.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).