How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Guru_Guy Your Own Question
Guru_Guy, Lawyer (JD)
Category: Legal
Satisfied Customers: 2418
Experience:  My specialties include Civil Rights and Constitutional law, as well as general practice issues.
Type Your Legal Question Here...
Guru_Guy is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

I was driving a mack truck on hwy 67 in missouri. There ...

Customer Question

I was driving a mack truck on hwy 67 in missouri. There were 2 vehicles with flashing lights on, on the shoulder. All of sudden they both wipped onto the highway in front of me goint extremely slow. I couldn''t go over into the next lane because there was another vehcile. So I hit my brakes and went into the shoulder, and about that time she went off into the shoulder an I hit her in the rear. Who is at fault here? The official report says I should of been more attentive to what was in front of me. Its a big truck I cant stop on a dime when I was going 60.
Submitted: 8 years ago.
Category: Legal
Expert:  Guru_Guy replied 8 years ago.
From your description, it sounds like the other person is mostly at fault. A vehicle pulling onto the road from the shoulder has a duty to make sure the lane is clear before proceeding. Therefore, the other party is at least partially at fault.

If you were speeding, even just a little, that could be considered as contributory to the accident. If you failed to slow down as you approached the vehicles on the shoulder, as might be reasonably prudent, that could also be considered contributory.

Missouri, like most States, is a comparative negligence State. This means a court would determine what percentage each party is responsible for the accident and assess damages accordingly.

In all likelihood, it sounds like you would be held at least partially responsible if the report said you were not attentive. Of course, if the case does go to court, you have the right to challenge that. But how a court decides that question of fact is not something that can be predicted with any accuracy here.

In short, the likely outcome is that you could be found partially responsible, but the plaintiff's own negligence would probably substantially reduce any award.

I hope this answers your question.


Please keep in mind that information in this forum is for informational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not constitute creation of an attorney client relationship. Before acting on any such information, you are always advised to consult with an attorney licensed to practice in your jurisdiction who can take the time to review all the facts and laws relevant to your situation.

Related Legal Questions