1. At the outset, a County Council may extinguish any public right of way within their jurisdiction. The County Council does not have to own the land on which the public right of way exists in order to do this. Provided the necessary notice requirements are placed in the appropriate newspapers, the extinguishment of the right of way is effective in law to end that right of way for all purposes. It does not matter how long the right of way has existed. It can still be extinguished by the County Council. As part of that jurisdiction, the County Council are fully within their power to "close" that right of way or to authorise other third parties to close the right of way by, for example, physically placing obstacles in the area that constitutes the right of way. There are two to three such cases in each County Council area each year. At the end of the day, apart from engaging in the consultation process and making representations through your County Councillor, there is little that a member of the public can do to prevent such extinguishment happening.
Please RATE the Answer positively so that I may get paid
You seem to missed out on the most important part of my question. The Council has claimed that there are 'legal impediments in relation to ownership' that prevent it from carrying our the physical closure (i.e. the land through which the public the public right of way passes is not in the ownership of the Council.) Your answer seem to contradict this claim by the Council. The road, the footpath and the green area (that form the right of way) are still in the registered ownership of the Builder. Either the Council is not being truthful in relation to the legal impediments or your answer is incorrect. The public right of way has already been extinguished. The Council has authorised a third party to close the right of way but is adamant that there are legal impediments to the Council itself carrying out the closure itself. The legal impediments have to do with the ownership of the land. I would be grateful if you would clarify this matter. There is a lack of logic here.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).