Hi - my name is XXXXX XXXXX X'X an Intellectual Property litigation attorney. Thanks for your question. I'll be glad to assist.
In order to be liable for copyright infringement, it must be proven that you have violated on of the exclusive rights owned by the copyright owner. These are reproduction, distribution, preparation of derivative works (also called adaptation), public display, and public performance.
In order to establish infringement, it would have to be shown that (1) you "copied" from the original work and that (2) the elements copied or otherwise used were an "improper appropriation" (the use of substantial and recognizable elements).
Here's a very good link you can read about this subject: http://www.whitecase.com/files/Publication/0c3e727d-4944-4529-80d9-81b79d3a7bff/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/8dff9d5a-d6ff-4039-bdf5-83bf7e7e25cb/Legal-Requirements-for-Bringing-Copyright-Infringement-Lawsuit.pdf
The botXXXXX XXXXXne is that you're not writing about Rudolph, although the storyline may have some similarities in nature, it's not substantially the same.
I can't promise you that you are immune from being sued if some company/copyright owner claims that you're in violation of their copyright. Even if it turns out in your favor - - someone could still sue. The most likely claim would be that you've made a derivative work/adaptation of the original story.
If you publish the book, issues like these will be reviewed closely by the publisher to ensure there is no problem with copyrights.
You can consider your writing as a whole and consider the infringement elements that must be proven to determine if you think there's an issue.
Thanks for your question, and please let me know if you need anything further.
Thank you for your response. I appreciate the link you sent. From that I gather that infringing requires substantial similarity to the original work. Does “the work” generally mean the work as a whole or an important detail. Does the court tend to read the definition of “substantial” broadly or more narrowly? The article refers to the “ordinary observer” test, which requires the observer to see substantial similarities between the original work and copied work. What does “substantial” mean to the court? That word lends itself to a variety of interpretations. Is it likely to be one major characteristic (red nose)? Is it enough that an observer would think, “Oh, a nose like Rudolph.” Or does it have to be a close copy of the character (teased red nosed reindeer who becomes a hero in the end)?
Would the fact page in the back that talks about the reindeer’s adaptation to brutal cold - dense blood vessel network in the nose causing a rosy glow – make it less easy to say this idea was copied? That fact that the animal is also a reindeer shouldn’t matter. The myth of flying reindeer at the winter solstice goes back hundreds and hundreds of year to Arctic rituals of involving hallucinogenic mushrooms! That surely is in the public domain – the myth, not the mushrooms.
As far as the story goes, they both involve Santa, a sleigh pulled by one or more reindeer, a reindeer with a colorful nose (red, pink). Other than that the story lines have very little in common. And from your comment, it seems that unless I’m writing about that specific red-nosed reindeer, Rudolph, the two stories are not substantially the same.
Would it be better to name the reindeer something like Freida or Ethel rather than Rhonda? Alliteration – Rhonda Reindeer – works well in children’s books. But it might provoke the similar sound of Rudolph the Red-Nose Reindeer in the mind of the observer. Would this be an infringement element that could be brought up?
Do you know where I would go online to find a copy of the Rudolph copyright or trademark? I did not see it at the site of the company that owns the copyright.
I am the publisher as well as the author; that’s why I’m asking about this.
Again, thank you for your help.
Thank you very much. I appreciate your time and expertise.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).