How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask montysimmons Your Own Question
montysimmons
montysimmons, Patent Prosecutor
Category: Intellectual Property Law
Satisfied Customers: 315
Experience:  Electrical Engineer, South Carolina Attorney, Member of US Patent Bar
9204196
Type Your Intellectual Property Law Question Here...
montysimmons is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

One more attend to write this claim. Considering that written

This answer was rated:

One more attend to write this claim.
Considering that written description cannot be changed at this point and that simultaneous interval is not defined, please verify the format of this claim specially the uppercase words.

The priority in this case could be assigned manually by a human operator based on visual signals generated by a display.
What is not relevant in this example:
--the number of sensors
--“floating boats detection process”

Below, the FIRST DISTINCTIVE VISUAL SIGNAL could be for example flashing the background color of display white-black-white-black. The FIRST DISTINCTIVE SIGN could be a triangle shown on display.
In other claims of the patent there are other distinctive ‘visual signals’ and ‘signs’ mentioned. This is why I name them ‘FIRST …’


A method of counting events from two sensors during a floating boats detection process when said sensors generate events simultaneously, the method comprising the steps of:

using an electric apparatus to detect when said sensors generated events simultaneously;

using one event counter for each sensor;

using a display apparatus to display specific signs used during said floating boats detection process and to display said event counters;

using a FIRST DISTINCTIVE VISUAL SIGNAL to indicate on said display apparatus when simultaneous events are detected by said electric apparatus;

using a FIRST DISTINCTIVE SIGN to indicate visually that one sensor has priority;

checking if said FIRST DISTINCTIVE SIGN is displayed on said display apparatus at the time when said FIRST DISTINCTIVE VISUAL SIGNAL was displayed on said display apparatus;

holding the event count of each sensor unchanged if said FIRST DISTINCTIVE SIGN is not displayed on said display apparatus at the time when said FIRST DISTINCTIVE VISUAL SIGNAL was displayed on said display apparatus;

assigning priority to one of the sensors by displaying said FIRST DISTINCTIVE SIGN on said display apparatus in the display area corresponding to the sensor which receives priority, if said FIRST DISTINCTIVE SIGN is not displayed on said display apparatus at the time when said FIRST DISTINCTIVE VISUAL SIGNAL was displayed on said display apparatus;

incrementing said event counter for the sensor which had said FIRST DISTINCTIVE SIGN displayed in its corresponding display area of said display apparatus at the time when said FIRST DISTINCTIVE VISUAL SIGNAL was displayed on said display apparatus; and

removing said FIRST DISTINCTIVE SIGN from said display apparatus after any event counter is incremented.

OK, Claims looks good.

 

Some suggestions.

 

(1) the word "DISTINCTIVE" (all places) is almost surely not necessary, and if not, should not be used - just eliminate the word.

 

(2) I would change "FIRST DISTINCTIVE SIGN" to "FIRST PRIORITY SIGN" or just "PRIORITY SIGN" if FIRST is not needed.

 

(3) claiming a step that does nothing seems unnecessary.

 

holding the event count of each sensor unchanged if said FIRST DISTINCTIVE SIGN is not displayed on said display apparatus at the time when said FIRST DISTINCTIVE VISUAL SIGNAL was displayed on said display apparatus;

 

Seems like this step can just be eliminated.

 

(4) floating boats ?

 

or floating boat (I am thinking this should be singular)

 

 

Thus, I would suggest:

 

A method of counting events from two sensors during a floating boat detection process when said sensors generate events simultaneously, the method comprising the steps of:

 


using an electric apparatus to detect when said sensors generated events simultaneously;

 


using one event counter for each sensor;

 

 

using a display apparatus to display [specific] signs used during said floating boat detection process and to display said event counters;

 

[Note: probably do not need "specific"]

 

 

using a FIRST VISUAL SIGNAL to indicate on said display apparatus when simultaneous events are detected by said electric apparatus;

 

 

using a FIRST PRIORITY SIGN to indicate visually that one sensor has priority;

 

 

checking if said FIRST PRIORITY SIGN is displayed on said display apparatus at the time when said FIRST VISUAL SIGNAL was displayed on said display apparatus;

 

 

assigning priority to one of the sensors by displaying said FIRST PRIORITY SIGN on said display apparatus in the display area corresponding to the sensor which receives priority, if said FIRST PRIORITY SIGN is not displayed on said display apparatus at the time when said FIRST VISUAL SIGNAL was displayed on said display apparatus;

 

incrementing said event counter for the sensor which had said FIRST PRIORITY SIGN displayed in its corresponding display area of said display apparatus at the time when said FIRST VISUAL SIGNAL was displayed on said display apparatus; and

 

 

removing said FIRST PRIORITY SIGN from said display apparatus after any event counter is incremented.

 

[ ----------------------------

 

use of word "any" is risky

 

now, if I wanted to design around this claim, I would simply have a extra event counter for something unnecessary and when I incremented the unnecessary counter I would not remove the priority sign.

 

Therefore, I would consider changing the last step.

 

"removing said FIRST PRIORITY SIGN from said display apparatus after said event counter is incremented."

 

---------------------]

 

COMMENTS

 

The claim looks very good based on what little I know about the subject matter.

montysimmons and 3 other Intellectual Property Law Specialists are ready to help you

Related Intellectual Property Law Questions