Mixed Apparatus and Method claims are called hybrid claims. Be very careful here.
Both the USPTO and the courts often hold that claims mixing apparatus and method claims as both unpatentable subject matter under §101 and indefinite under §112 ¶2.
Restated, an apparatus claim including method steps will be non-statutory (invalid).
Types of Valid Claims
(1) Apparatus claim
(2) Method Claim (pure method)
(3) Method performed by an apparatus
(4) Method of using an apparatus
Here are your claims
1. A system of detecting floating boats, comprising: two sensors; a radio; a controller; and a box.
2. A method of connecting sensors, wherein the method is applicable to a system claimed in claim 1, the method comprising: connecting the sensors serial; and matching the sensors by size.
You can't have an apparatus in claim 1 and add a method in claim 2. Such is not allowed. Further, your claim 1 is a little strange:
"A system of detecting . . ." implies a method claim is following and then you only give structure in the body of the claim instead of "steps."
If such a claim was held to be valid, it would be read as if you used: "A system for detecting . . . "
You would need to use a format like this:
1. An apparatus for detecting floating boats, comprising: two sensors; a radio; a controller; and a box.
2. An apparatus for detecting floating boats as in claim 1, wherein said two sensors are connected in series and wherein the two sensors are matched by size.
1. A system of detecting floating boats, comprising the steps of: providing two sensors electrically associated with a radio and a controller; and providing a box to house said two sensors, said radio, and said controller.
2. A system of detecting floating boats as in claim 1, further comprising the steps of connecting the sensors in series and matching the sensors by size.
Just do not draft method steps that are dependent from an apparatus claim; this never works. Further, do not add "method" steps inside and apparatus claim. Such a claim will be invalid also.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).