How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask montysimmons Your Own Question
montysimmons
montysimmons, Patent Prosecutor
Category: Intellectual Property Law
Satisfied Customers: 328
Experience:  Electrical Engineer, South Carolina Attorney, Member of US Patent Bar
9204196
Type Your Intellectual Property Law Question Here...
montysimmons is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

Below I made up two patent claims as an example. This patent

This answer was rated:

Below I made up two patent claims as an example. This patent is for USA.

1. A system of sensors, comprising:
two sensors;
and a box.
2. A method of connecting sensors, wherein the method is applicable to a system claimed in claim 1, the method comprising:
connecting the sensors serial;
and matching the sensors by size.

My question: is claim #2 a correct dependable claim ?
I'm interested especially if this part of the claim is correct: "wherein the method is applicable to a system claimed in claim 1,"

montysimmons :

No. I do not believe one can mix apparatus and method claims like you did here.

montysimmons :

IF I were going to mix "method" and "apparatus" claims, I would do it something like this.

montysimmons :

1. A method of connecting sensors comprising the steps of: providing two sensors electrically associated to form a sensor system;

montysimmons :

providing a box to house said two sensors.

montysimmons :

2. A method of connecting sensors as in claim 1, further comprising the steps of: electrically associating said two sensors in a serial configuration and matching the sensor by size.

montysimmons :

in the specification you would need to give a definition of "electrically associating"

montysimmons :

in the specification you would need to define what matching the sensors by size means and give examples or this claim would like be indefinite.

montysimmons :

*system; and

montysimmons :

Now the claims above are not perfect, but they are in the correct form.

Customer:

the technical idea is not a concern.

Customer:

But my worry is about the way I call other claim" wherein the method is applicable to a system claimed in claim 1,". I had the impression that they don't like this kind of 'long' format of refereeing to another claim.

montysimmons and other Intellectual Property Law Specialists are ready to help you

Related Intellectual Property Law Questions