I would also like to confirm your issue of trademark or trade dress infringement.
If I compile and then modify existing recipes for body products from online blogs and websites and/or create recipes of my own using the ingredients list from a commercial company I understand that this is legal. Correct? I realize that I cannot call a product the same name as the commercial producer, i.e. Ruth's Rosy Rub, however, could I call it Ruth's Rosy Rub Replica or Replica of Ruth's rosy Rub? I have seen some knock off perfume companies who call their products " Compare to Estee Lauder's Beautiful Cologne" in the name of their duplicate product. I don't want to infringe on their trade name of their product understanding that there could be confusion, but if I clearly state that is is a representation of the original commercial product, does that suffice?
Okay, I think I understand. Here is one last question, in order to make this theoretical situation more clear, let me clarify my scenario a bit. I have a compilation of ingredients for different products from the product sheets themselves from a company called Lush. They are wildly popular and quite frankly very easy (in many cases) to replicate at home. Therefore, I wanted to put together a small home made cosmetics book, with many of my interpretations of some of Lush's products. For example, I have developed a very good body bar which uses the same ingredients and appears and smells the same as Lush's body bar called "Buffy". Clearly I want to be able to use the words Lush and Buffy somewhere in the text of my recipe in order for the user to understand what product this recipe will be like. Can you tell me how to phrase this such that it is explicitly clear that it is my recipe interpretation of the published ingredients which I created, or that has been created on blogs of other folks websites, is similar to the Lush's "Buffy Bar"?
Thanks, XXXXX XXXXX been really helpful
Thanks for the information. With regards XXXXX XXXXX trademark or trade dress infringement, if I have a recipe in my book, which I have compiled and modified from other blog websites or created myself using the ingredients that are the label of the product, from this cosmetic company, can I call this recipe "Ruth's Rosie Rub" Replica? I see this often for knock off or simulations of cologne. Such as, "compare to Estee Lauder "Beautiful" cologne".
What you are requesting is an iron-clad protective device. Other than a license from the manufacturer, there is no such mechanism. The larger your competitor, the more likely you will be sued, because large, famous brands usually have several dozen employees who do nothing but read and search for infringing advertisements in the international marketplace for their products and services. It is beyond dispute that "parody," and "editorial commentary," about a product is "fair use." and not the subject of any legal action -- as long as the use is not tied to directly to a commercial use. So, perhaps if you were writing a treatise on how cosmetics are made, for the use of chemists, or you are intentionally poking fun at an industry that attempts to glorify what is in essence "face paint," and you compare your various recipes to more than one cosmetic product simutaneously, then that would provide the sort of cover (pun intended) to keep you out of trouble. But, if you write a treatise which instructs others on how to replicate individual cosmetic products, and you compare each to the specifc product with which you are clearly attempting to compete, then you will be sued, if only to increase your costs of doing business, by your having to pay for the legal expenses necessary to defend. Please understand that while I would like to give you an answer that guarantees you protection, there is simply no way to do so. You are in fact, trying to trade off of the good will of the products of others. That's the entire point of your exercise. Otherwise, you would make your own products and market them as your own. So, at the outset, your competitors have the high ground. Yes, there are undoubtedly competitors doing things like you are attempting (using the "compares to [name]" formula. But, in my opinion, this legal formula becomes more and more risky, the more transparently you attempt to invade the good will of the large cosmetic firms. The reason is because the "totality of circumstances" shows the court what you are attempting is not merely to instruct chemistry students on how to make cosmetics. Instead, you are trying to sell your products as duplicates of an established and trademark registered product. Such a device will inevitably fail, no different than were GM to advertise its Corvette Stingray as "comparable to a Ferrari 405 Italia." It's one thing for Car and Driver Magazine to do this as part of a review of the vehicles. It's quite another for GM to do it as a means of trying to make their $50,000 sports car appear more desirable, because it compares favorably to a $250,000 competitor's vehicle. Hope this helps.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).