How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask montysimmons Your Own Question
montysimmons, Patent Prosecutor
Category: Intellectual Property Law
Satisfied Customers: 315
Experience:  Electrical Engineer, South Carolina Attorney, Member of US Patent Bar
Type Your Intellectual Property Law Question Here...
montysimmons is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

HI, I would like to reproduce old franked postal stamps on

Customer Question

I would like to reproduce old franked postal stamps on a page in a book. I can find many of these stamps on Google images. Would I face any legal issues by doing so.
Thanks for your advise.
Submitted: 3 years ago.
Category: Intellectual Property Law
Expert:  montysimmons replied 3 years ago.


Hello, welcome to Just Answer. I will be helping you.


I see you are offline so I will switch modes and answer outside of chat mode.

Expert:  montysimmons replied 3 years ago.

Generally speaking, anytime you use material created by another there is a risk of a copyright issues. The question typically becomes: “How much risk?”


To answer the question completely, lots of background information is needed.


Background Information


I will assume that old “Franks” are devices or markings associated with a piece of mail (i.e. stamps, stamped impressions, manuscript writings (such as "privilege" signatures) and basically any authorized form of “franking” to qualify the item to be delivered by a postal service.




Copyright Act: "Only the owner of copyright in a work has the right to prepare, or to authorize someone else to create, a new version of that work."


The use of preexisting contemporary images implicates three sections of the Copyright Act:


  • • the exclusive right to reproduce a work,
  • • the exclusive right to prepare derivative works, and
  • • the exclusive right to display a work publicly.


Thus, a “copyright” includes the exclusive right to prepare derivative works based on the copyrighted work. However, your images are "old franks" and are likely not contemporary images. You will need to verify same using the guidelines below.




But what about images in the public domain (which we hope your “franks” are in the public domain)? Who can use and modify such images?


As is well known, items in the “public domain” are free to use and copy by all. Thus, “Franks” in the public domain are free to copy and use by all INCLUDING the making of “derivative works” based on such “Franks”.


If one creates a derivative work based on a “Frank” in the public domain, one has a copyright in such derivative work for the “new” artistic expression but not the old material.


So what qualifies as a “derivative work”?


Notably, an adaptation of a preexisting work must contain “some substantial, not merely trivial, originality.


A “derivative work” is a work based upon one or more preexisting works, such as a translation, musical arrangement, dramatization, fictionalization, motion picture version, sound recording, art reproduction, abridgment, condensation, or any other form in which a work may be recast, transformed, or adapted. A work consisting of editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship, is a “derivative work”. (Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 101)




ANSWER 1: If a “frank” is in the public domain you can freely copy it and make derivative works based on such item.


ANSWER 2: If a “frank” has been altered in some substantial non trivial way creating and new work, such “modified frank” is subject to a copyright (owned by the creator of the “new” material) and cannot be copied without permission.


The original version of the “frank” that is in the public domain can still be copied, just not the new material.




Arranging a set of public domain items in a book is often considered a copyrightable derivative work called a compilation.


Factual compilations, for example, may possess the requisite originality for copyright protection.


If the selection and arrangement are original, these elements of the work are eligible for copyright protection. However, no matter how original the format the facts themselves do not become original through association.


Consequently, copyright in a factual compilation is said to be thin.


Same for “franks”; a compilation of “old franks” may be copyrightable but no matter how original the format and arrangement, the “franks” themselves do not become original through association.




ANSWER 3: Thus, if one copies individual “franks” from a compilation (i.e. book) containing public domain “franks”, such is not a problem.


But the more one copies groups of “franks” form a compilation of "old franks" there is a higher risk one will copy the protected format and arrangement which results in a higher risk of copyright infringement.




You would need to know the first publication date of your “old franks” and use the information below to make a good guess as to the current status of any copyright term (if there ever was a copyright). Determining the term of a copyright is tricky - Copyright terms and public Domain material as of 2013.




(1) Unpublished works: author known : Life of author + 70 years (works from authors who died before 1943 now in public domain);


(2) Unpublished anonymous works, works for hire : 120 years from date of creation (Public Domain: works created before 1893);


(3) Unpublished works where author date of death not known . . 120 years from date of creation (Public domain if created before 1893)




(4) Published Before 1923: None : work in public domain;


(5) Published 1923 - 1997: Published without copyright notice - in public domain;


(6) 1878-1989 - Published without notice and without registration for 5 years - in public domain;


(7) 1923 - 1963 : Published with notice but copyright not renewed - in public domain;


(8) 1964 - 1977 : Published with notice : 95 years after publication date;


(9) 1978 to 1989 : Created before 1978 and published with notice : (copyright probably valid till December 2047);


(10) March 1989 through 2002 : Created after 1977 : 70 years after the death of author, for corporate authorship 95 years from publication or 120 years from creation;


(11) march 1989 through 2002 : Created before 1978 and published in same period : copyright probably valid until December 2047;


(12) after 2002 : 70 years after death of author, 95 year from publication or 120 years from creation for corporation;


(13) Works prepared by government employee or agent as part of official duty : IN Public Domain.




According to the U.S. Philatelic catalog, the first stamp to include a copyright notice was the Captain Cook stamps issued in 1978.


Thus, if U.S. postal stamps are protected by copyright laws, such protection would seem to have become effective during/after 1978. US stamps used before 1978 should be in the public domain.


To qualify their stamps for copyright, the USPS privatized the “stamp making” department thereby removing stamps from the category of works produced by federal employees.




ANSWER 4: Thus, if the “Frank” is a US stamp that predates 1978, likely in the public domain.

Expert:  montysimmons replied 3 years ago.
If you need additional information, please feel free to ask another question.

Also, please remember to come back and rate my previous answer and give feedback.


JustAnswer in the News:

Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.

What Customers are Saying:

  • Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises! Gary B. Edmond, OK
< Previous | Next >
  • Mr. Kaplun clearly had an exceptional understanding of the issue and was able to explain it concisely. I would recommend JustAnswer to anyone. Great service that lives up to its promises! Gary B. Edmond, OK
  • My Expert was fast and seemed to have the answer to my taser question at the tips of her fingers. Communication was excellent. I left feeling confident in her answer. Eric Redwood City, CA
  • I am very pleased with JustAnswer as a place to go for divorce or criminal law knowledge and insight. Michael Wichita, KS
  • PaulMJD helped me with questions I had regarding an urgent legal matter. His answers were excellent. Three H. Houston, TX
  • Anne was extremely helpful. Her information put me in the right direction for action that kept me legal, possible saving me a ton of money in the future. Thank you again, Anne!! Elaine Atlanta, GA
  • It worked great. I had the facts and I presented them to my ex-landlord and she folded and returned my deposit. The 50 bucks I spent with you solved my problem. Tony Apopka, FL
  • Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help. Mary C. Freshfield, Liverpool, UK

Meet The Experts:

  • Alex Reese

    Alex Reese


    Satisfied Customers:

    Experienced in intellectual property law
< Last | Next >
  • Alex Reese's Avatar

    Alex Reese


    Satisfied Customers:

    Experienced in intellectual property law
  • Robert McEwen, Esq.'s Avatar

    Robert McEwen, Esq.


    Satisfied Customers:

    Licensed Texas General Practice Attorney
  • Dimitry K., Esq.'s Avatar

    Dimitry K., Esq.


    Satisfied Customers:

    I assist my clients with IP questions that arise in their daily course of doing business.
  • Thomas Swartz's Avatar

    Thomas Swartz


    Satisfied Customers:

    Twenty one years experience as a lawyer in New York and New Jersey. Former Appellate Law Clerk.
  • Ely's Avatar


    Counselor at Law

    Satisfied Customers:

    Licensed attorney in private practice.
  • Wilton A. Person's Avatar

    Wilton A. Person


    Satisfied Customers:

    MBA, Experienced and Knowledgeable in Intellectual Property Law
  • BartEsq's Avatar



    Satisfied Customers:

    Juris Doctor

Related Intellectual Property Law Questions