An extraction process for a natural product compound in class of compounds (broad) is patented, with the application of said compound (and class) to increasing a hormone and acting like that hormone.It actually is actually a hormone agonist, it just mimics a hormone...whoever patented this compound and its class got it wrong, they just pulled rumors off the web. The in vitro tests prove the fact that this compound does not increase an endogenous hormone, it mimics one. So , since the patent got the mechanism wrong, can someone come along and patent that compound and others in that class with the correct mechanism, i.e. that it just mimics the human hormone but does not increase the natural hormone's levels? Otherwise, bogus info has been patented, unchalleged. The lab data prove this out.
Hi, I’m a moderator for this topic and I wonder whether you’re still waiting for an answer. If you are, please let me know and I will do my best to find a professional to assist you right away. If not, feel free to let me know and I will cancel this question for you. Thank you!