How JustAnswer Works:

  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.

Ask DXJAnswerMagic Your Own Question

DXJAnswerMagic
DXJAnswerMagic, Professional w/Adv. Degree
Category: Homework
Satisfied Customers: 2044
Experience:  MALS, BA with honors in 3 majors and 2 minors, assisted K-12, Undergrad and Grad students
Type Your Homework Question Here...
DXJAnswerMagic is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

For DXJ Writer: Due Thursday! I will provide you with worksheets

Customer Question

For DXJ Writer:

Due Thursday! I will provide you with worksheets just as soon as the instructor post them!

· Complete the blank Ethical Dilemma Worksheet located in the course materials forum.

· Use the Prosecutors Scenario, located on the student website.

· Review the Ethical Dilemma Worksheet sample located on your student website and posted to the course materials forum.

· Use the blank Ethical Dilemma Worksheet located in the course materials forum. Do not use the one located on your student web site.
Submitted: 2 years ago.
Category: Homework
Expert:  DXJAnswerMagic replied 2 years ago.

DXJAnswerMagic :

Hi! Do you have the case and the worksheet? That sample worksheet really helped a lot last time!

Customer:


Prosecutors Scenario



Ethical Issue: Prosecutors


 


Officers Nixon and Rook decided to arrest the husband for driving under the influence. He is taken to the station for processing. During processing, the husband is visibly agitated. He keeps mumbling to himself and rocking back and forth in his chair. His wife comes to the station and reports that her husband had some bad experiences while in Somalia. She requests that he be allowed to return home with her after processing. The police officers, already at the end of their shift, readily agree.


 


Officer Rook is designated to write the report and deliver it to the prosecutor’s office. P. Ross Acute is the issuing deputy district attorney. He is reviewing this police report to decide whether to file charges against the husband. The report accurately depicts the facts. While he is reviewing the report, Officer Nixon comes into his office.


 


Officer Nixon tells the prosecutor that the police report had been mistakenly dropped off before being signed off by a supervisor, which is required under city policy and procedures. Officer Nixon swaps the previous report for a new report, explaining that the new report was signed off by a supervisor and is more complete.


 


D.D.A. Acute notes that the main difference between the old and new reports is that it states that the officers observed the husband driving and then parking the blue station wagon as the patrol car pulled up at the residence.


 


What should the prosecutor do?


Customer:

University of Phoenix Material




Ethical Dilemma Worksheet



Incident Review




















































  1. What is the ethical issue or problem? Identify the issue succinctly.


 


 


 


 


 



  1. What are the most important facts? Which facts have the most bearing on the ethical decision presented? Include any important potential economic, social, or political pressures, and exclude inconsequential facts.


 


 


 


 


 


 



  1. Identify each claimant (key actor) who has an interest in the outcome of this ethical issue. From the perspective of the moral agent—the individual contemplating an ethical course of action—what obligation is owed to the claimant? Why?


Claimant


(key actor)



Obligation (owed to the claimant)



Perspective (What does the claimant hope will happen?)



 



 



 


 


 



 



 



 


 


 



 



 



 


 


 



 



 



 


 


 



 



 



 


 


 






Evaluating Alternatives


 













































  1. What are two alternatives for the scenario? One alternative can be a wild card that you ordinarily may not consider an option because of potential implications. Both should be within free will and control of the same moral agent.


Alternative A



Alternative B



 



 



  1. Respond to the following questions based on your developed alternatives.




Alternative A



Alternative B



What are the best- and worst-case scenarios if you choose this alternative?



 


 


 


 


 



 



Will anyone be harmed if this alternative is chosen? If so, how will they be harmed? Consider families and derivative effects.



 


 


 


 


 



 



Would honoring an idea or value—such as personal, professional, or religious—make the alternative invalid?



 


 


 


 


 


 



 



Are there any rules, laws, or principles that support the alternative? Are there rules, laws, or principles that make the alternative invalid? State the rule or principle and indicate if it invalidates or supports the alternative.



 


 


 


 


 


 


 



 



 




Applying Ethical Guidelines

































































  1. Consider each ethical guideline and explain whether it would support or reject your alternative.


Guidelines based on the action itself



Alternative A



Alternative B



Should this alternative become a rule or policy that everyone in this situation should follow in similar situations in the future? (Kant)



 



 



Does this alternative result in using any person as a means to an end without consideration for his or her basic integrity? (Kant)



 



 



Is the intent of this action free from vested interest or ulterior motive? (Kant’s good will)



 



 



Does this alternative demonstrate a genuine concern for others affected by the decision, and is the moral agency responding to a perceived need?



 



 



Guidelines based on consequences



Alternative A



Alternative B



Is the good that results from this alternative outweighed by the potential harm that might be done to others? (Mill’s harm principle)



 



 



Is any harm brought about by anyone other than the moral agent? (causal harm)



 


 



 



Will anyone be harmed who can be said to be defenseless? (paternalism)



 


 



 



To what degree is this alternative based on the moral agent’s own best interest? (ethical egoism)



 



 



Which alternative will generate the greatest benefit—or the least amount of harm—for the greatest number of people? Select only one alternative. (utilitarianism)



 



 



 


Ethical Decision Making













  1. Choose to proceed with either Alternative A or Alternative B and explain the reasons for your decision.


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 



 

Customer:

That's the blank worksheet

Customer:

SORRY THAT'S THE WRONG BLANK WORKSHEET!

DXJAnswerMagic :

:-) It happens.......Just get it to me when you can. Thanks so much! DXJ

Customer:

HERE'S THE WORKSHEET SAMPLE........

Customer:

University of Phoenix Material




Ethical Worksheet Sample



Incident Review




















































  1. What is the ethical issue or problem? Identify the issue succinctly.


The moral agent is a criminal defense attorney. The attorney knows of another criminal defense attorney who is an alcoholic and ignores his client obligations. What should the moral agent do?



  1. What are the most important facts? Which facts have the most bearing on the ethical decision presented? Include any important potential economic, social, or political pressures, and exclude inconsequential facts.


The attorney often appears in court intoxicated. He ignores his cases and does not file appropriate motions before deadlines expire. His clients, who are court-appointed, usually end up with convictions and heavy sentences due to his incompetence. In trial, he is unprepared and unprofessional. Defendants have complained. Defense attorneys, prosecutors, and judges are aware of his incompetence and have done nothing. The attorney’s disbarment would likely cause drastic economic consequences for the attorney. If the moral agent is responsible for his disbarment, the moral agent may face the social stigma and pressure of being labeled a snitch. With emphasis on stiffer penalties for defendants, there is political pressure to ignore the situation, as only alleged criminals are affected by his incompetence.



  1. Identify each claimant (key actor) who has an interest in the outcome of this ethical issue. From the perspective of the moral agent—the individual contemplating an ethical course of action—what obligation is owed to the claimant? Why?


Claimant


(key actor)



Obligation


(owed to the claimant)



Perspective (What does the claimant hope will happen?)



Incompetent attorney



Fidelity, beneficence



The attorney would prefer that the moral agent ignore the situation and do nothing.



Clients



Beneficence, non-injury



The clients would prefer that the moral agent help them obtain new counsel or that the attorney's incompetence was corrected.



Other criminal defense attorneys



Fidelity



Good defense attorneys would prefer that the incompetent attorney's behavior was corrected or that he be prevented from practicing criminal defense. Marginal defense attorneys might prefer that the moral agent does nothing, lest their own actions be called into question.



Prosecutors, judges, and bailiffs



Beneficence, non-injury



Bailiffs would prefer not to have to accommodate his unpreparedness and intoxication in the courtroom. Prosecutors and judges may prefer that the moral agent does nothing, as a more competent attorney may make their job more difficult with motions and objections. Some prosecutors and judges may prefer that the incompetent attorney's behavior was corrected or that he was prevented from practicing to avoid reversals on appeals due to his incompetence.



Society



Justice



The advocates of law and order may prefer that the moral agent does nothing, as criminals will receive harsher sentences as a result and the process will be more streamlined. Advocates of individual rights would prefer that the incompetent attorney's behavior was corrected or that he was prevented from practicing law.




Evaluating Alternatives


 













































  1. What are two alternatives for the scenario? One alternative can be a wild card that you ordinarily may not consider because of potential implications. Both should be within free will and control of the same moral agent.


Alternative A



Alternative B



Talk to the attorney and offer to help him with his cases while he seeks treatment for alcoholism.



File an official report with the agency that is responsible for appointing cases to him.



  1. Respond to the following questions based on your developed alternatives.




Alternative A



Alternative B



What are the best- and worst-case scenarios if you choose this alternative?



Best case: The incompetent attorney accepts the generous offer, addresses his drinking problem, changes his behavior, and thereafter represents his clients effectively.


 


Worst case: The attorney rejects the offer, and his incompetent behavior continues.



Best case: His behavior is corrected, or he is removed from the appointment panel.


 


Worst case: Little action is taken by the agency and the behavior continues. The moral agent is labeled a snitch.



Will anyone be harmed if this alternative is chosen? If so, how will they be harmed? Consider families and derivative effects.



The moral agent may be harmed by the financial consequences of agreeing to help the incompetent attorney if the moral agent is not provided with monetary compensation for the work performed. The moral agent may be harmed by potential backlash if the offer is rejected and if the agent encounters the incompetent attorney in future professional dealings.



The attorney may be harmed if removed from the panel and he does not have other opportunities to generate revenue. If he has a family, the family could be harmed as a result of the loss of income. The moral agent's reputation may be harmed by the negative label. The panel may be harmed by the loss of one of its attorneys.


 



Would honoring any idea or value—such as personal, professional, or religious—make the alternative invalid?



Perhaps family values would be compromised if the time constraints from assisting the attorney result in the moral agent's decreased ability to take care of family obligations, including spending time with them.



The value of loyalty to fellow criminal defense attorneys is called into question.



Are there any rules, laws, or principles that support the alternative? Are there rules, laws, or principles that make the alternative invalid? State the rule or principle and indicate if it invalidates or supports the alternative.



Standard 4-1.2(d) states: The defense counsel should seek to reform and improve the administration of criminal justice. When inadequacies or injustices in the substantive or procedural law come to the defense counsel's attention, he or she should stimulate efforts for remedial action.


 


This ethical rule supports the alternative.



Standard 4-1.2(d) states: The defense counsel should seek to reform and improve the administration of criminal justice. When inadequacies or injustices in the substantive or procedural law come to the defense counsel's attention, he or she should stimulate efforts for remedial action.


 


This ethical rule supports the alternative.



 


Applying Ethical Guidelines
































































6. Consider each ethical guideline and explain whether it would support or reject your alternative.



Guidelines based on the action itself



Alternative A



Alternative B



Should this alternative become a rule or policy that everyone in this situation should follow in similar situations in the future? (Kant)



No



Yes



Does this alternative result in using any person as a means to an end without consideration for his or her basic integrity? (Kant)



No



No



Is the intent of this action free from vested interest or ulterior motive? (Kant’s good will)



Yes



Yes



Does this alternative demonstrate a genuine concern for others affected by the decision, and is the moral agency responding to a perceived need?



Yes: concern for others and responding to a perceived need are implicated



Yes: concern for others and responding to a perceived need are implicated



Guidelines based on consequences



Alternative A



Alternative B



Is the good brought about by this alternative outweighed by the potential harm that might be done to others? (Mill’s harm principle)



Possibly



No



Is any harm brought about by anyone other than the moral agent? (causal harm)



No



Yes: the decision of panel



Will anyone be harmed who can be said to be defenseless? (paternalism)



Maybe: the moral agent's family



Maybe: incompetent attorney's family



To what degree is this alternative based on the moral agent’s own best interest? (ethical egoism)



Not based on the moral agent's own interests; based on the best interests of the state bar association



Not based on the moral agent's own interests; based on the best interests of the state bar association



Which alternative will generate the greatest benefit—or the least amount of harm—for the greatest number of people? Select only one alternative. (utilitarianism)



 



Alternative B will generate the greatest benefit.



 


Ethical Decision Making













  1. Choose to proceed with either Alternative A or Alternative B and explain the reasons for your decision.


I recommend that the moral agent report this conduct to the appointment panel. This would help correct his behavior, which affects his appointed cases and those who retain him. These people would have civil recourse and the ability to hire another attorney. It would not necessitate extra work hours for the moral agent, which may negatively affect the moral agent's family. If the behavior continues, then the moral agent could follow up by reporting the behavior to the state bar association. The label of snitch might be possible to avoid, especially if the moral agent's name is XXXXX XXXXX during the disciplinary proceedings. If it is not possible to avoid, any negative consequences from this label would be offset by those who appreciated and respected the moral agent's actions.



 

DXJAnswerMagic :

Got it! Thanks!

Customer:

HERE'S THE BLANK WORKSHEET.....

Customer:

University of Phoenix Material



Ethical Dilemma Worksheet & Rubric



CJA/324 Ethics in Criminal Justice



Incident Review


Week _______


Student Name: ________________________________































































  1. What is the ethical issue or problem? Identify the issue succinctly. (15 points)


Points


Earned



 


 


 


 


 



 



  1. What are the most important facts? Which facts have the most bearing on the ethical decision presented? Include any important potential economic, social, or political pressures, and exclude inconsequential facts. (14 points)


Points


Earned



 


 


 


 


 


 



 



  1. Identify each claimant (key actor) who has an interest in the outcome of this ethical issue. From the perspective of the moral agent—the individual contemplating an ethical course of action—what obligation is owed to the claimant? Why? (14 points)


Points


Earned



Claimant


(key actor)



Obligation (owed to the claimant)



Perspective (What does the claimant hope will happen?)





 



 



 


 


 



 



 



 



 


 


 



 



 



 



 


 


 



 



 



 



 


 


 



 



 



 



 


 


 



 






Evaluating Alternatives


 






















































  1. What are two alternatives for the scenario? One alternative can be a wild card that you ordinarily may not consider an option because of potential implications. Both should be within free will and control of the same moral agent. (14 points)


Points


Earned



Alternative A



Alternative B





 



 



 



  1. Respond to the following questions based on your developed alternatives. (14 points)


Points


Earned





Alternative A



Alternative B





What are the best- and worst-case scenarios if you choose this alternative?



 


 


 


 


 



 



 



Will anyone be harmed if this alternative is chosen? If so, how will they be harmed? Consider families and derivative effects.



 


 


 


 


 



 



 



Would honoring an idea or value—such as personal, professional, or religious—make the alternative invalid?



 


 


 


 


 


 



 



 



Are there any rules, laws, or principles that support the alternative? Are there rules, laws, or principles that make the alternative invalid? State the rule or principle and indicate if it invalidates or supports the alternative.



 


 


 


 


 


 


 



 



 



 




Applying Ethical Guidelines













































































  1. Consider each ethical guideline and explain whether it would support or reject your alternative. (14 points)


Points


Earned



Guidelines based on the action itself



Alternative A



Alternative B





Should this alternative become a rule or policy that everyone in this situation should follow in similar situations in the future? (Kant)



 



 



 



Does this alternative result in using any person as a means to an end without consideration for his or her basic integrity? (Kant)



 



 



 



Is the intent of this action free from vested interest or ulterior motive? (Kant’s good will)



 



 



 



Does this alternative demonstrate a genuine concern for others affected by the decision, and is the moral agency responding to a perceived need?



 



 



 



Guidelines based on consequences



Alternative A



Alternative B





Is the good that results from this alternative outweighed by the potential harm that might be done to others? (Mill’s harm principle)



 



 



 



Is any harm brought about by anyone other than the moral agent? (causal harm)



 


 



 



 



Will anyone be harmed who can be said to be defenseless? (paternalism)



 


 



 



 



To what degree is this alternative based on the moral agent’s own best interest? (ethical egoism)



 



 



 



Which alternative will generate the greatest benefit—or the least amount of harm—for the greatest number of people? Select only one alternative. (utilitarianism)



 



 



 



 


Ethical Decision Making



















  1. Choose to proceed with either Alternative A or Alternative B and explain the reasons for your decision. (15 points)


Points


Earned



 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 



 



TOTAL POINTS EARNED



 



 

DXJAnswerMagic :

ok:-)

DXJAnswerMagic :

Finally got all this copied.

DXJAnswerMagic :

I'll start working through the rest of this tonight. DXJ

DXJAnswerMagic :

Halfway through this:-)

DXJAnswerMagic :

Your worksheet is here and here.

DXJAnswerMagic :

Both download options should open in a new window.

DXJAnswerMagic :

Hope this helps! DXJ

DXJAnswerMagic, Professional w/Adv. Degree
Category: Homework
Satisfied Customers: 2044
Experience: MALS, BA with honors in 3 majors and 2 minors, assisted K-12, Undergrad and Grad students
DXJAnswerMagic and 11 other Homework Specialists are ready to help you
Expert:  DXJAnswerMagic replied 2 years ago.
What Happens Now?

Your chat has ended, but you can still work with your Expert to get an answer to your question if you have not yet received one.

Come back to this page at any time to see additional information from your Expert.  You will also receive an email when your question is updated.  If you want to send a message to your Expert, use the box below.

If you have already received a satisfactory answer to your question, click the Accept button above.  Experts are credited for each accepted answer they provide.
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
I have rec'd this one, but can you tell me where you are on the the team assignment? Will you have it today?
Expert:  DXJAnswerMagic replied 2 years ago.

Hi! You never gave me the additional details for the team assignment:-)

You told me you would give me the details last night or today.

Attachments are only available to registered users.

Register Here

If you give me those I might be able to get it to you late tonight. DXJ

Customer: replied 2 years ago.

I sent it thought you rec'd it last night. I so sorry! It is on Corrections and there is no word count on this because it's a PowerPoint presentation. We just need the points on the slides and detailed speaker's note (about a paragraph). So we need to give the one doing the actual powerpoint part enough information to put this together.

Attachments are only available to registered users.

Register Here

Attachments are only available to registered users.

Register Here

Attachments are only available to registered users.

Register Here
View Full Image

Attachments are only available to registered users.

Register Here


Expert:  DXJAnswerMagic replied 2 years ago.

Any specific questions you need to answer for the corrections part?

Sorry, it's still not clear.

 

Love the graphic!!!!!! DXJ

Customer: replied 2 years ago.
I sent you that specific question in the very first message about the assisgnment
Expert:  DXJAnswerMagic replied 2 years ago.

Ok, let me look back through the conversations.......

Sorry, still getting my bearing after the technical difficulties experienced here over a day and a half........Appreciating your patience!

Attachments are only available to registered users.

Register Here
DXJ

Customer: replied 2 years ago.

You replied

Wednesday, February 29, 2012 8:21 PM EST

To what do you attribute these violations-the personality of the guards, lack of training, or some other factor? How might these violations be deterred or prevented? Explain.

 

That's my question- It's either going to be on:

 

Ethics Issue Presentation, located on the student website, and select one of the following options to complete the assignment.

 

  • Option 1: Law Enforcement Ethics
  • Option 2: Defense Attorney Ethics
  • Option 3: Prosecution Ethics
  • Option 4: Correction Ethics

Also waiting the word breakdown on how many everybody's part has to be!

 

SO TELL ME HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT IT- ARE YOU WILLING TO HANDLE THIS FOR ME? I THINK IT'S GOING TO BE ON OPTION #4

Expert:  DXJAnswerMagic replied 2 years ago.

This, I do recall.........

Sometimes, when conversations get scattered across threads, it gets confusing:-)

Many apologies!!!!!!

 

I can help. DO you absolutely need this tonight or can I get it to you early tomorrow?

 

Customer: replied 2 years ago.
Let me check, because it was suppose to be in by midnight tonight.so the person who has to do the powerpoint will have a day to get it together and back to us to sign off on before handing it in. So, I would have to check with her....
Expert:  DXJAnswerMagic replied 2 years ago.
ok...........
Customer: replied 2 years ago.
Ok, she is willing to wait but she would like to have it very early tomorrow morning the latest
Expert:  DXJAnswerMagic replied 2 years ago.

That would be wonderful!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Thanks so much!

Attachments are only available to registered users.

Register Here
DXJ

Customer: replied 2 years ago.

Your welcome, but the thanks is all yours!

Attachments are only available to registered users.

Register Here

Expert:  DXJAnswerMagic replied 2 years ago.

Attachments are only available to registered users.

Register Here

JustAnswer in the News:

 
 
 
Ask-a-doc Web sites: If you've got a quick question, you can try to get an answer from sites that say they have various specialists on hand to give quick answers... Justanswer.com.
JustAnswer.com...has seen a spike since October in legal questions from readers about layoffs, unemployment and severance.
Web sites like justanswer.com/legal
...leave nothing to chance.
Traffic on JustAnswer rose 14 percent...and had nearly 400,000 page views in 30 days...inquiries related to stress, high blood pressure, drinking and heart pain jumped 33 percent.
Tory Johnson, GMA Workplace Contributor, discusses work-from-home jobs, such as JustAnswer in which verified Experts answer people’s questions.
I will tell you that...the things you have to go through to be an Expert are quite rigorous.
 
 
 

What Customers are Saying:

 
 
 
  • Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help. Mary C. Freshfield, Liverpool, UK
< Last | Next >
  • Wonderful service, prompt, efficient, and accurate. Couldn't have asked for more. I cannot thank you enough for your help. Mary C. Freshfield, Liverpool, UK
  • This expert is wonderful. They truly know what they are talking about, and they actually care about you. They really helped put my nerves at ease. Thank you so much!!!! Alex Los Angeles, CA
  • Thank you for all your help. It is nice to know that this service is here for people like myself, who need answers fast and are not sure who to consult. GP Hesperia, CA
  • I couldn't be more satisfied! This is the site I will always come to when I need a second opinion. Justin Kernersville, NC
  • Just let me say that this encounter has been entirely professional and most helpful. I liked that I could ask additional questions and get answered in a very short turn around. Esther Woodstock, NY
  • Thank you so much for taking your time and knowledge to support my concerns. Not only did you answer my questions, you even took it a step further with replying with more pertinent information I needed to know. Robin Elkton, Maryland
  • He answered my question promptly and gave me accurate, detailed information. If all of your experts are half as good, you have a great thing going here. Diane Dallas, TX
 
 
 

Meet The Experts:

 
 
 
  • Manal Elkhoshkhany

    Tutor

    Satisfied Customers:

    4520
    More than 5000 online tutoring sessions.
< Last | Next >
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/BU/BusinessTutor/2012-2-2_115741_Kouki2.64x64.jpg Manal Elkhoshkhany's Avatar

    Manal Elkhoshkhany

    Tutor

    Satisfied Customers:

    4520
    More than 5000 online tutoring sessions.
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/LI/lindaus/2012-6-10_04811_IMG20120609164157.64x64.jpg Linda_us's Avatar

    Linda_us

    Finance, Accounts & Homework Tutor

    Satisfied Customers:

    3121
    Post Graduate Diploma in Management (MBA)
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/ComputersGuru/2010-02-13_051118_Photo41.JPG LogicPro's Avatar

    LogicPro

    Engineer

    Satisfied Customers:

    3035
    Expert in Java C++ C C# VB Javascript Design SQL HTML
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/lanis/2009-4-1_233717_phput9xef_c1pm.jpg Lani S.'s Avatar

    Lani S.

    Tutor

    Satisfied Customers:

    2457
    Registered Nurse, Internet Researcher, Private Tutor
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/chooser77/2009-08-18_162025_Chris.jpg Chris M.'s Avatar

    Chris M.

    M.S.W. Social Work

    Satisfied Customers:

    2341
    Master's Degree, strong math and writing skills, experience in one-on-one tutoring (college English)
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/JawaadAhmed/2009-6-27_12137_SIs_SHadi.jpg F. Naz's Avatar

    F. Naz

    Chartered Accountant

    Satisfied Customers:

    1975
    Experience with chartered accountancy
  • http://ww2.justanswer.com/uploads/JK/jkcpa/2011-1-16_182614_jkcpa.64x64.jpg Bizhelp's Avatar

    Bizhelp

    CPA

    Satisfied Customers:

    1873
    Bachelors Degree and CPA with Accounting work experience