This is my fault because I should have been more specific. I probably should have geared the question to the legal community as I was looking for actual legal arguments using deductive and inductive augments as in empirical studies or case law that would have supported the premises and conclusion.
My fault. I am going to accept the answer as I may be able to adapt it to my research as a general example so please allow this as private.
Thanks for your prompt reply. You clearly know your stuff. My question was pretty weak. Sorry about that. Believe it or not, I may be able to work this into research I have already done. Thanks again!