How JustAnswer Works:

  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.

Ask Jane T (LLC) Your Own Question

Jane T (LLC)
Jane T (LLC), Former straight A Student - Now Mom
Category: Homework
Satisfied Customers: 8435
Experience:  Degrees in Eng., econ; JD (law), MBA, former valedictorian & winner of academic scholarship
Type Your Homework Question Here...
Jane T (LLC) is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

160 Word min.: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act

This answer was rated:

160 Word min.: Consider the internal control process required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Do you think the expenses of implementing better internal controls are offset by the benefits of having the controls?

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act is basically aimed at increasing proper financial disclosure. Remember the troubles of Enron and Arthur Anderson...we certainly cannot have large corporations reporting their financial status incorrectly to Wall Street....

About the Sarbanes-Oxley Act….

The legislation came into force in 2002 and introduced major changes to the regulation of financial practice and corporate governance. Named after Senator Paul Sarbanes and Representative Michael Oxley, who were its main architects, it also set a number of deadlines for compliance.

An over-arching public company accounting board was also established by the act, which was introduced amidst a host of publicity. (A Guide To The Sarbanes, Par. 3-5).

*Read more about this act at:

Dear Customer,



Overall, no. If the internal controls enforced by the Sarbanes Oxley Act would guarantee that fraud and other wrongful accounting practices would be eliminated then they would certainly offset the cost of their use. However, given that the practices the Sarbanes Oxley Act was meant to put an end to occurred when there were strict accounting ethical controls, corporate ethical policies in place, and the SEC was believed to have been regulating the preparation of financial reports of public companies there seems to be little that can be done, regulation wise, to prevent or stop fraud and misleading reporting. In fact, the regulation of the Sarbanes Oxley Act may do more harm than good because, just as the regulation of the SEC did when Enron and WorldCom took place, it may serve to mislead people into believing everything they read. Financial statements need to be reliable, but regulating ethical conduct to assure that the results are reliable is not, sadly, likely to solve the problem of ethics that underlay the issue. Companies and their leaders are rewarded for making profits and raising stock prices, their ethical conduct is rarely considered unless something goes wrong. Sarbanes Oxley does not more to correct this than the SEC laws and accounting ethics did before Enron and WorldCom.



Jane T (LLC) and 3 other Homework Specialists are ready to help you
Customer: replied 7 years ago.


I received a question to your answer. I will pay 6$ or more for a good reply answer to the question below:



How can you say there were strict practices already in place? CEO's were able to choose board members and large companies were auditing each other's reports with an, "I'll scratch your back if you'll scratch mine" attitude. I would like to know what your thoughts are after you read the article below I found in the CSU Library.

Carcello, Joseph V. "From crisis to confidence: what is the role of regulation?(viewpoint)(Viewpoint essay)." TheCPAJournal 79.6 (June2009): 14(2). AcademicOneFile. Gale. COLUMBIA SOUTHERN UNIV. 22 Sept. 2009


You need to spend $3 to view this post. Add Funds to your account and buy credits.
Customer: replied 7 years ago.


Thank you for all the help, if I need more I'll be coming to you. I was un able to pay through this post. So I posted a separate question for you labeled "For, Jane T (LLC)". Thank you

Customer: replied 7 years ago.


The question is now labeled "This Question Is For, Jane T (LLC)" sorry for any inconveniences this may cause you, but it's the only way I know to do it. Just type anything in to my question so I can accept. Thank you



I found it and posted an answer.

Customer: replied 3 years ago.

Hey Jane!! Do you think you can help me with this? I have 2 jobs and I'm running behind in school.


I am sorry, but I just cannot take something like that on. It is too much for me. Also, I am glad I logged on today and was able to respond fairly quickly to you. I am no longer on regularly at all and I would not want you to send me something and have it waiting.

I will opt out.

Related Homework Questions