No - I haven't found an answer yet. I will continue to wait for your reply.
Good Day, My name is Andrea, I am a Licensed, Practicing Attorney and will help you in any way I can. Please allow me a little time to do some research on French mortgages.
Q. What terms does the mortgage document recite if you stop making payments to the mortgagee (Credit Agricole) ?
Hello, again, I did the research on your question and this is the information I found,
First, the mortgage document which you signed will indicate whether or not it is recourse, or non-recourse where Credit Agricole could come after you for any deficiency, even if you gave the property back to them. However, my research also revealed that in almost all of these leaseback transactions, a "Non-Recourse Mortgage" is used, so that the lender is confined to the property and cannot go after the borrower's other assets
Second, it is highly unlikely that Credit Agricole would come after you for any deficiency even if it were a recourse situation because they do not like going after the borrowers. Additionally, if they were to sue you (which they would not), they would have to sue you in the UK and the Courts in the UK and in Ireland who hear these cases are very sympathetic towards the borrowers because the Courts frown upon the practices engaged in by the French lenders , and the "packages" which are sold to the buyers in these leaseback situations, including a management company.
For all of the foregoing reasons, you could give the property to the lender without fear that Credit Agricole would come after you for the difference between the loan and the diminished value of the property,
Please be kind enough to rate "Excellent Service" so that I receive credit
for assisting you,
Bonus and Positive Feedback on survey is very much appreciated,
Thank you Andrea for your comments. I am initially greatly encouraged by what you say. However, given that this matter relates to a lot of money, I do have a couple of queries in respect of the points you make as I want to make sure of my position:
As the mortgage document is in French (and my understanding of French is marginal) I can't tell which clause will confirm whether or not this is a "non-recourse" mortgage. Can you suggest how I can be certain whether the bank would have any recourse?
Also, your research suggests that "almost all" leasebacks are non-recourse - what are the characteristics of those leasebacks in which the bank does have recourse against the borrowers?
Finally, I don't understand why the bank would sue me in the UK (if it turned out that there was recourse). Surely they would sue me in France where the property is located, obtain judgement and then enforce an EU enforcement order in the UK?
Hello, Geoff, Thank you for your follow up questions and the opportunity to explain further,
1. Since the mortgage document contains the rights and obligations of the parties, the best way (and only way) to be certain of whether it is recourse, or non-recourse is to obtain a translation of the mortgage document from French to English. However, and as I stated in my previous Answer, even if the mortgage document provided that it was a "recourse" obligation, the French banks have not exercised that right;
2. There are no "characteristics" that distinguish an obligation which is a "recourse debt" from a "non-recourse debt". There is only the one statement in the mortgage document itself;
3. In order to execute on the personal assets of an individual, the lender must first obtain a judgment against the individual, and in order to obtain a judgment against the individual, the Court must have personal jurisdiction over the individual. A Court can only obtain personal jurisdiction of a Defendant, if he is served with process (The Court papers) within the Court's jurisdiction. A French Plaintiff suing in a French Court would have to serve the Defendant within the borders of France. In other words, a Plaintiff suing in a French Court would have to serve the Defendant within France. Therefore, the reason that French banks and lenders have sued English citizens in the English Courts in the UK and Irish citizens in Irish Courts is because that is the only way they can obtain personal jurisdiction over the individual that they would need in order to obtain a judgment against the individual and his other assets for a recourse debt,
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).