While I wait for your response, I am going to assume this has not been incorporated into a final decree. So what that means, is that the separation agreement is binding based on contract law, and not upon the divorce decree. This means that any violations can result in a breach of contract suit, but not in contempt charges.
However, in order for a settlement agreement to be binding, both parties must have their signatures notarized. Here is that statute:
§ 52-7. Validation of certificates of notaries public as to contracts or conveyances between husband and wife. Any contract between husband and wife coming within the provisions of G.S. 52-6, executed prior to the first day of January, 1955, acknowledged before a notary public and containing a certificate of the notary public of his conclusions and findings of fact that such conveyance is not unreasonable or injurious to the wife, is hereby in all respects validated and confirmed, to the same extent as though said certifying officer were one of the officers named in G.S. 52-6.
Separation agreements can be voided if they are the result of fraud, coercion, ignorance or lack of mental capacity but that is rare.
The court may determine that the agreement is inherently unfair, but that really varies by judge, as it is discretionary. So one would want to check the record of the local judge to see how s/he has ruled in the past.
This is called docket searching:
Post here please
No further questions?
kindly rate positively!
all information is legal
information only and
does not constitute
specific legal advice
or a particular course
of action. Thank you