I have problem with my attoney's paralegal. After I complained her work, she hated me. She became very not profecional. For example; when I called, asked address of court house, she told me " I don't know!", When I asked how much is about printing fees " $10,000! ", actual cost was about $2,500. When we had meeting with a forensic accountant for my receiving maintenance issue, she tried to convince accountant that we had short marriage
, we separated xxx, but actually I explained many times that we were living together untill right before filing devorce. At my husband's deposition, he stated that he was spending our marital assets for his ex-wife's alimony
, his son's honeymoon, and other his living expenses. My attorney told me that automatically that not allow to touch. Paralegal said, not problem, 50% is his. Paralegal said, we only traveled during the marriage was to Japan, once. We traveled England, Paris, Israel, Japan, Casta Rica, and other domestic. Paralegal tried to convince accountant that we lived very low maintenance. She also said to me " fix your dog, that makes low maintenance, low vet's fees!" I raise my dog holistic, my dog is my family member to me.
Anyway, there were many more. I expressed my fear of having her. When I first talked my attorney, he also don't like she is getting too friendly with my husband's attorney. She is bad mood because she found out she has tumor. His wife also did not like she knows too much information about my attorney's wife..etc., but now, my attoney suppots her that she is working excellent for me. His office can not run without her, he depend on her.
But I difenatelly, her existence in my attoney's office will hurt my case. My lawyer emailed me if I don't like her, I shoukd change lawyer. I don't want to change, if he reimbursed $75,000, he received, I might.
What should I do? Also, he told me before he understood my complain. He also don't like her acting like lawyer. He sometime angry at her. When she told me that judge through away my postnup agreement. But infact was genuine agreement.