Sorry for the late response, I have been tangled in this too upset to respond.
My lawyer tells me, the judge is mad because when I filed the original restraining order and I had full custody of my son - what happened was I had gotten out of the house and left the state for 2 months to stay with friends. Then I was pleading with my husband to let me see my 3 year old son (the only child). He refused to let me see him, and started threatening
me. I filed a restraining order for myself and my son, it was granted. But I had nothing and I either had to go to a woman's shelter (I've been before and it's awful) or go to my friends parent's house in Illinois - this all happened in Nebraska.
I had talked to the sheriff and someone at the court house, and no one had ever told me I can't leave the state. I was in Illinois for 3 weeks, while trying to figure out how to come back to Nebraska. When I returned to Nebraska for an immigration appointment, I was served a notice to give my son back to the father, because I had become a danger to my son and I was a flight risk. The judge told my lawyer this last trial (the trial was all behind closed doors only) That I violated the law by taking my son away and even though I've now been in Nebraska for 2 months that I am still a risk for taking my son away.
But, when I left I went straight from Nebraska to a house in Illinoiis, and never left that house until I came back to Nebraska. Not like I was fleeing. Also, I became romantically involved with a friend of mine helping me, and currently he is paying for most of this, and here with me.
It seems like everything revolves around that. The previous court order had loose language saying that my husband and I need to work out 3x per week visitation supervised and everyday skype. I video taped my husband talking badly about me while I was skyping with my son, and video'd my son saying bad things to me, like I'm and idiot and not his mommy anymore. And like I had said, the supervised visitation had occurred 1x in 2 months of me being back in Nebraska. My husband having any excuse for me not being able to do it & the supervision was supposed to be a neutral party, but the only 2 people he told me can do it are 2 of his family members. So I accepted, but his family could never do it and the other times he had reasons he couldn't. Finally, I think he ran out of excuses and told me I need to hire a supervisor at $100 a visit to see my son again, and he knows I can't afford having to pay for a supervisor a lawyer already and only scraping by.
This was all submitted to the judge this last trial, video's, messages from my husband denying me to see my son, affidavits from people I know saying I'm a good mother. And this new temp order (which isn't in writing yet) is going to state I can see my son 3x per week 2 hours per visit in a public place. My husband is required to provide the supervisor. No more skype is allowed, but I can make phone calls. I feel like I've been branded a criminal, and now I've been following all the rules, but my husband hasn't and I have less time with my son? Does this make any sense???