Good morning Dave, Thanks for asking for me. I am a bit confused. I think what they mean is that they will seek a court order allowing them to collect the rent from you---that is not the same as a judgment against you, and if you don't voluntarily pay, they still must file a separate suit against you before they can get a judgment against you. In order for the court to issue a judgment against you, you must first be sued---a Motion won't do that by itself. If the court, after you are sued, then issues the Judgment against you for the past rent, it will act as any other judgment and the party receiving the judgment may then seek to collect the money owed from you personally, through a wage garnishment or a levy on your bank account. When faced with the lawsuit, you will want to defend against it the same as you would have the landlord sued you for the rent. You will need to file a responsive pleading/Answer to the suit and urge that the property is uninhabitable and that the full rent should not be found to be owed based on the inhabitability. Obviously, you should have an attorney assist you if you are sued. And if there is a judgment issued, you might consider filing bankruptcy if you cannot afford to pay the judgment. You may reply back to me again, using the Reply to Expert link, if you have additional questions. I wish you the best in your future, Doug
Hi Doug, Thanks for the quick reply. I may be confusing some of this. The letter is full of legal jargon and I'm not sure what it all means. I copied direct quotes from the letter to hopefully clarify this a bit:
Letter titled: Motion of plaintiff for judgement against [me]
"This firm represents plaintiff, [client's name], in the captioned case. Kindly accept this letter in lieu of a more formal brief in support of [the client's] motion for an Order entering judgement in favor of [the client] against [me] for monies ordered to be paid but were not paid."
"The Court should enter judgement against [me] for all rents past due and should compel all future rent payments be paid to the [law firm] trust account."
"...the total rent due is [rent amount], and [the client] respectfully XXXXX XXXXX entry of judgement in its favor and against [me] for the total rent due."
"In conclusion, [the client's] motion should be granted and an Order should be entered for judgement in favor of [the client] and against [me] for the total rent due."
I'm not exactly sure what that all means, the type of legal action they are looking to take, and what i need to consider to protect/defend myself. I already have a new lease and will be fully moved out by the time the lawyers bring this before the court.
Also, if you have not guessed yet, the letters written by the lawyer are very one-sided. There is a transcript in the set of paperwork from a deposition that i appeared at (which is around the last time i contacted you), and that contains my side of the story. But again, their letters to the court are devoid of that.
I am not a named defendant. The landlord is the defendant.
The plaintiff's lawyers are only targeting the tenants in my building because there is a levy on the rent.
In the heading of the letter it does clearly refer to the case in question: "[plaintiff] vs. [my landlord]; docket number; judgement numbers." We are then listed right underneath that: "Motion of plaintiff for judgement against [me]"
Thanks Doug, understood. So it would be in my interest to have my side heard before this thing goes before a court.
If a judgement is issued against me without a hearing, would I be able to contest it, or is it then too late? And, from the sounds of it, does the judgement sound as if it is a set and done deal where I am now legally required to pay the amount requested?
Would it be worth me taking the landlord to court (knowing he won't show up) so that my side of the story is on record in landlord-tenant court?
It likely would not be connected to the original case since it is not a landlord-tenant or real estate dispute, but at least i would be on record.
Good afternoon Dave,We have gone quite a ways beyond your original question.. You originally asked what it would mean if the lawyers were successful with their motion. As you may not be aware, the Rules of JustAnswer specify that each customer ask onequestion in each question thread. For new questions like this one, about a lawsuit you might file against your landlord, I am required to ask that you place these new questions in a new thread, as is required by JustAnswer. I do sincerely XXXXX XXXXX any inconvenience this might cause you.
You may ask for me personally by referring to me by name (Doug) in your new question and I will be able to assist you. As the questions that you are posing are new, I am required to ask you to please open up a new question thread for them. Thank you for your understanding.Doug
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).