Family Law Questions? Ask a Family Lawyer Online.
They are supposed to share custody equally. She feels that she has all the say in this situation and he doesnt rock the boat, because she is a difficult person to deal with. He doesn't want it to get ugly. The original divorce decree, has split the bills and she is the one who wrote it up and he went along with it. He has followed it and given her more than she asked for because he wanted his daughter to be safe and happy. she is persuing more money, because she thinks she needs more. She was asking $400.00 a month and he told her no because he cant afford it.
She went to $200.00 but it isn't in the divorce decree. She was supposed to pay him. But she never did.
Thank you for your follow-up, Rosanne.It sounds as if it has already gotten somewhat ugly. Please allow me to share a few thoughts based on the facts that you have provided.First of all the fact that she remarried to someone far more well-off is a non-issue. The child is your son's and the other person's, so it is their responsibility to care for the child. Unless the other party formally adopts the child and in process severs your son's paternal obligations (obviously not likely or happening), he is never going to be responsible for any care or maintenance.As for your son's obligations, have him go to the link below:http://www.azcourts.gov/familylaw/childsupportcalculator.aspxThis link would allow him to formally estimate and calculate what his real obligation is. If he is paying more than the minimum and she is demanding additional costs, have him file a formal petition for modification to the courts, AND if she is withholding the child, also file a separate motion to compel, which is a request that the courts take formal notice of her not following the terms of the agreement. Then, if she still fails to allow him time to see the child, he could then file a petition for contempt of court and pursue her for intentionally refusing to allow him access or time as provided. He likewise can also go to court and state that the expenses have to be decided upon jointly and if he can care for the child (via you) and not via childcare, those expenses and their lack of necessity should also be taken into consideration.Good luck.
In the divorce it states that as long as the time split between parents is equal there will be no child support for either party. Now with my daughter going to school full time, the time will be more equally split. So with the mom filling for child support will this make her request obsolete?
Thank you for your follow-up, Roseanne.Which request, for support? It may be possible for your son to claim and show that since there was an agreement in the divorce, the parties cannot pursue additional benefits. But typically child support conditions are not fully honored--the courts look to substantial changes if any, and if those exist, they may intentionally choose to allow modifications to take place. If, for example, at the time divorce was granted both parties made about the same, and now one party makes significantly more, that party can be made to pay support based on change in circumstance.Good luck.