For the purposes of calculating support GROSS incomes are utilized and therefore any taxes that would be taken out of the income and/or that are owed at the end of the year are irrelevant. If the Attorney is calculating the income based off of the H's 2012 GROSS Income Tax Return and based off of W's income based on her estimated income from the Support then the factoring in of SSD income would actually INCREASE her Gross Income.
If I have answered all of your questions please press accept and provide positive feedback so I will get credit for assisting you. PLEASE NOTE: this is a PAID answering service and we only receive credit for assisting you if you accept the answer. If you are not satisfied and need additional assistance, please ask before providing negative feedback and I would be glad to assist you further. Sometimes I am working with more than one customer at a time so please allow a chance to respond. Thank you and I wish you the best in your situation! I strongly suggest that you consult with a local attorney in your area on this matter. This information is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice nor has an attorney-client relationship been formed.
In Pa, spousal support uses net income of the parties. The general formula is that the higher earning spouse pays 40% of the difference in the parties' monthly net income. So, I'm not following your answer. Thanks.
I will opt out so a PA attorney can answer
Yes. Thank you.
Thank you for your follow-up.Under PA regulations any spousal support that is received becomes wages and income that the receiver of the funds has to disclose But that generally is calculated at the time the funds are received, not at the time those funds are scheduled to be received. In other words if the funds are owed for 2012 but are received in 2013, they are likewise claimed and taxed in 2013. It is now too late to modify 2012 returns because those funds were not obtained in 2012.Good luck.
I think I need to clarify the question. The attorneys are calculating the parties' net incomes for 2012 to establish the %, consistent with income, that should be used for calculating retroactive support. For example, before I lost my job, the figures used were 65%-35%. I have an extension on 2012 taxes - they haven't been paid yet. What I'm trying to ask but I might not be making any sense is this: when H's 2012 net income is determined, the amount he pays in taxes is taken out of gross to get to his net. I wondered if a similar thing should be done with mine? If so, I'd have my accountant run the numbers quickly for what I'd owe in taxes so it could be deducted from my gross. If that doesn't make sense, don't worry about trying to figure it out. Also, I just tried to send you another question. Am I correct that I just need to put your name at the beginning of the question?
Thank you for your follow-up. Let me go line by line here so I do not miss anything.The attorneys are calculating the parties' net incomes for 2012 to establish the %, consistent with income, that should be used for calculating retroactive support. For example, before I lost my job, the figures used were 65%-35%. I have an extension on 2012 taxes - they haven't been paid yet. What I'm trying to ask but I might not be making any sense is this: when H's 2012 net income is determined, the amount he pays in taxes is taken out of gross to get to his net. I wondered if a similar thing should be done with mine? If so, I'd have my accountant run the numbers quickly for what I'd owe in taxes so it could be deducted from my gross. If that doesn't make sense, don't worry about trying to figure it out.I honestly am not sure I understand. The calculation is based on the party who is obligated to make payments and not the receiver. I am unclear as to why you wish to recalculate the income for yourself. Also, I just tried to send you another question. Am I correct that I just need to put your name at the beginning of the question?That is correct, if you wish to speak with me directly, simply start your questions "For Dimitry..." and I will be notified that you are seeking me out.Good luck!
I must be missing something?? So, for example, my income in 2012 is $X consisting entirely of SSD benefits. No taxes were taken. H's net income is $A. My income, with no SSD taxes taken out is $B. So H "get to have" a lower income number in terms of what he has to pay me in support. Conversely, I think I have a higher number than I should which would mean H would have to pay me less. If my actual net income was used (that is, SSD minus taxes), my income would be lower. So the reason I think I'd want to recalculate is that by lowering my income to take tax into account, there's a wider % spread between H and me.
Thank you for your follow-up.Now I understand your point. However that isn't how support is calculated, it is based on gross receipts, not net. If you earn $15,000 a year, for example, but your net amount is $13,000, the first number is XXXXX is used to calculate obligation, not the second.Good luck.
All calculations in this case have always been done based on net?? I think there's a part of the PA Code that specifically says for support guidelines that the higher wage earner has to pay 40% of the difference in the parties' net incomes??
Thank you for your follow-up.You are correct, here is the PA Code that governs it, and it does require both parties to provide net income as a means of calculating the proper support. I do apologize, this is something I always treated as gross myself. Your accountant can modify the amount and figure out the calculations directly on the net basis. Here is the law below:http://www.pacode.com/secure/data/231/chapter1910/s1910.16-4.html
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).