Thank you for allowing me to assist you.
Your ex is permitted to use the money in any fashion she chooses and it is common to replace a vehicle with insurance money. Whether or not you would have to continue paying has more to do with whether the debt was assigned to you or your spouse. It sounds like your agreement addresses the payments, rather than the debts. Is your agreement part of the final divorce judgment? What exactly (word for word) does it say about who pays the debt on the car?
Marital Property and Debts
10. Respondent shall have the following property: a. The 2009 Chevy Malibu.
12. The Petitioner agrees to pay all debts owed by the parties on the foregoing marital property and all credit card debts current as of June 7, 2010.
Under those terms, she does not have to use the insurance money to pay the car payment since the auto debt is not her responsibility. You remain liable for the auto payment and he can keep the funds from the insurance company and do anything she wants with those funds.
Lets say she does get a check cut directly to her and uses for her personal self. Don't you think a court would see this poorly and possibly overturn the divorce agreement because of it? This was a divorce agreement between us, not court ordered.
Also, my name is XXXXX XXXXX title of that car. Can an insurance agency cut her the sole check?
It was never signed by the judge? Was it filed in the court file?
Did the decree of dissolution adopt the settlement agreement?
Yes, what I'm saying is that we didn't go to divorce court to have our divorce settled. We sat down and agreed on the terms ourselves. I took all debt we had, out of pure goodness. Ky is a 50/50 state, and I knew that. I wanted my daughter to have a safe car to be transported in and I knew my ex couldn't afford it so I took all of our responsibilities. It was signed and filed. But, knowing this, don't you think a judge would look very poorly on her for using funds from a car I was paying for on my own will for her good benefit? I would think that would frown on that, sticking me with $15,000 in debt on a crashed car, on purpose.
If it is not part of the divorce decree, it is not a final and enforceable term. You can go to divorce court and ask for a different disposition of the property and debts. I assumed that your settlement agreement was part of the divorce proceeding. Are you still married? If not, does the divorce decree say anything about property and debts? Does it incorporate your agreement by reference? You need to look at the decree to determine if your agreement is enforceable. If it is an enforceable agreement, I do not think the judge would question her decision to buy another car with the funds rather than pay off the existing car. If she does so, everybody is in the same position they were in before - she has a working car and you are paying the family debt. But if your agreement has not been made enforceable, the Court would be less likely to require you to pay that debt without your current agreement.
17. This agreement shall be made a part of any Decree of Dissolution of Marriage which may be entered in the herein action.
And a decree has been entered?
Yes, we have been divorced for over 3 years.
It seems likely to me that the agreement is enforceable but technically, it should state in the decree, signed by the Judge, that the agreement is incorporated by reference or adopted as part of the decree.
We only paid $200 to this attorney for this to be written up. It's pretty loose, I bet.
Can I scan and email it to you? It may make it easier on both of us. If she tries this and you find a loophole, I'll pay you the payment for a few months!
:) As tempting as that is, I'm not permitted on this site to accept emails from customers. All communication must be through this forum. If you are able to tell me in this chat what the decree says, I can certainly comment on it though. I know that I have an "attachment" option. Do you have one too? You may be able to send it attached to this chat.
I do have one, but I think I found what you are looking for. I'll type it.
7. The Court finds that the parties have executed a Separation Agreement which settles issues of property, custody, visitation, and support, which Separation Agreement is attached hereto and made a part hereof the same as if copied herein verbatim. The Court finds this Agreement to be fair and equitable to both parties. The Separation Agreement attached to this decree is enforceable by the further orders of this Court.
Yes, the agreement is enforceable then. Sorry I couldn't give you better news.
Well, I don't think many insurance companies cut checks directly to the policy holders do they? Don't most of them require repair estimates and then sent the check to the repair facility?
Also, since their is still a lien on this car, wouldn't she still be required to have full coverage insurance on it even if she leaves it in a crashed condition?
It can go either way. Years ago, when my motorcycle was totaled, they sent the money directly to me. She would not be required to insure a totaled car.
If the company totals it then they would have to have the title, which the lien holder won't release unless the balance is paid. Correct?
If what company totals it? The insurance company?
No, all the insurance company does is defer to the opinion of a mechanic who deems the repairs to be more expensive than the value of the vehicle. If that happens, there is no car to be titled (unless the parts are used to create a salvage title vehicle), so the original title is irrelevant. The lienholder's title is worthless and it never has to be released.
And was your cycle paid for or was there a lien on it? I'm assuming you were the outright owner.
Mine was paid for.
OK, Steven. Thank you for you help. I appreciate your time tonight.
You're welcome and good luck.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).