Good afternoon Darrin,I'm Doug, and I'm sorry to hear of the confusion. My goal is to provide you with excellent service today.The issue as regards XXXXX XXXXX may take the child to the doctor and incur medical expenses has nothing to do with who the primary custodial parent is. In fact, under ND law, in the majority of custody decisions---while there is usually a primary custodial parent appointed--and they get child support from the other parent, both parents are generally invested with legal custody, and it is the legal custody that allows the parent to take the child to a physician.In rare circumstances, a court will order that absent an emergency situation, that one parent must obtain the permission of the other to take the child to a medical provider---but that instance is quite rare.And if one parent is held to be responsible for all or part of medical expenses incurred by the child, there is no pre-approval process for that parent to participate in---again, unless there is such an order of the court---and the parent ordered to pay the medical expenses by the court would then have to pay the expenses not directly authorized by them---so long as the other parent presented the child for care.And so yes, it is legal for the other parent to provide the insurance information that provides the medical coverage for the child---even if that coverage happens to be under the other parent's medical policy.I wish you the best in 2013.I understand that you may be disappointed by the Answer you received, as it was not particularly favorable to your situation. Had I been able to provide an Answer which might have given you a successful legal outcome, it would have been my pleasure to do so.You may reply back to me using the Reply to Expert link if you have additional questions.Kindly take a moment to rate my service to you based on the understanding of the law I provided. Please understand that I have no control over the how the law impacts your particular situation.Thank you,Doug
Doug to clarify my question the parent that brought the child in for services did not have legal custody so there was no joint or shared custody of any kind. Does that change or impact your opinion?
You additional facts are confusing. What do you mean that they did not have legal custody? What do you mean that there was no joint or shared custody at all? If they had no legal right to custody and visitation, and no parenting rights under the law, why was the child with them in the first place?Are we talking about a father that was never married to the mother, and there was never a court order of support, custody or visitation?Please explain.Doug
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).