Thank you for using JustAnswer. I am researching your issue and will respond shortly.
I'm sorry to hear about your situation. Do you happen to know if there was any written policy in regards XXXXX XXXXX constitutes job abandonment with the employer? And how long did you leave temporarily?
does in the handbook state item # XXXXX leaving the job or taking alternate routes without authorization.
And how long did you leave temporarily?
less than an 1hour and 15min. and I returned
Thank you. Do you happen to know if your written employment policies say anything about being terminated "for cause" or anything about "at will" employment?
my handbook does state at will but the lady was not my supervisor at the time to my knowledge with the authority to fire me or anyone
Have you contacted HR, your supervisor's boss, or anyone else to confirm whether or not you have been fired? (that is, if she did not have the authority to fire you, have you checked to make certain that you're actually fired?)
yes I did have a meeting with the VP of the company and she told me that I was fired and that she would talk to HR ( who was recovering from surgery at the time),and that she the VP would call me the following day or two to give me the decision that was made ,but she didn't call me.The information that was given to the VP from the lady that told me that I was fired ,prior to my meeting with the VP told that day that I would have to contact the VP to even tell me why I was fired
Thank you. Again, I am sorry to hear about your situation. First of all, you need to understand that employment in Oregon is "at will", as your written employment policies reaffirm. This is the default, in that no written document need state that your employment is "at will", and a reaffirmation will "solidify" that fact. At-will employment means that without a contract, you have no contractual or other right to employment with the company. The company is entitled to fire you for any reason: a good reason, a poor reason, or no reason at all--as long as the company does not fire you for an illegal reason (race, gender, age, religion, etc...).
The fact that your employer says that you "abandoned" your job, while it's clear that this is not the case, is not going to be the basis for a wrongful termination action, because you were an "at will" employee. Only if you had a written employment contract or there was some written policy that specifically said that you would only be terminated "for cause" would you have a chance at a wrongful discharge case.
That being said, "abandonment" has a different meaning when it comes to applying for unemployment, which it seems that they're trying to set up the case to contest any filing that you make for unemployment benefits. Per Oregon's Board of Labor and Industries (BOLI), there is no official definition of "job abandonment" under Oregon's wage & hour laws. But abandonment means abandonment. It does not mean unauthorized absence, but rather an absence without the intent to return. Where there is not an official definition of this in the written employment policies, the Oregon Employment Department (who makes the determination of eligibility) will make the determination of whether you objectively abandoned the job. That is, from an outsider's perspective, was it objectively clear that you abandoned... I think it's clear that 1 1/2 hours is not abandonment, from that perspective.
Further, the laws governing your rights as a terminated employee (vs voluntarily quitting employee) would apply, in that you would be due your paycheck at the end of the next business day, rather than the next payday.
Again, the fact that the employer applies its own policies against you, even negligently, is not going to be the basis for a wrongful termination action unless you can show that it's "pretext", in that the REAL reason for termination was based on illegal discrimination (age, race, gender, religion, disability).
BUT for other rights (final paycheck, unemployment, etc...) you almost certainly would not be deemed to have "abandoned", objectively, your position.
Most of the time that would require multiple DAYS of "no shows".
so could this be grounds for denying my unemployment benefits while I'm seeking further employment
I've never seen a case where a job abandonment was found (by the unemployment benefits board) in the case of less than a full workday's absence.
It could be grounds if they ultimately determine that it was abandonment. But I would be shocked if they did.
You can (and should) file for benefits. Your ex employer may contest it, and if they do, most likely the initial benefits will be denied.
You should then appeal...
The reason is that if your employer contests it, most of the time they deny it without looking at the evidence.
The first time that you present your side of the story is often at the appeal. And the board will see that the "abandonment" that they claim was less than 1 1/2 hours, in which they almost certainly will say that this was not "abandonment" in the unemployment context.
(and thus, you would then be eligible for benefits)
Again, I am sorry to hear about your situation, and I am saddened that your company would treat you this way. It was clearly unethical, immoral, and unjust. It just was not illegal. I know this is probably not what you wanted to hear, but it is the law. I hope that clears things up anyway. I do think that you are eligible for benefits, and you should absolutely apply (and appeal if they contest and you're denied, for the reasons I said above).
I do wish you the best of luck in this matter, and hope that you find a much better employer that treats you as you deserve to be treated.
If you have any other questions, please let me know. If not, and you have not yet, please rate my answer AND press the "submit" button, if applicable. Please note that I don't get any credit for my answer unless and until you rate it a 3, 4, 5 (good or better). Thank you, XXXXX XXXXX luck to you!
Did you have any other questions before you rate this answer?
Are you there? Please note that I am still here, awaiting your response.
I am still here and I agree this was unethical ,immoral and unjust and that the employee and employer did this at will or just because they could ,and they did contest my UI benefits but there has not been a hearing as of yet but I was informed by the UI office that it was contested
In that regard you should comply with the UI office in any information requested, etc... Again, if they deny it, make certain that you appeal (you should get information for the appeal from the UI office).
I think that it's clear that this is not abandonment (which requires clear evidence that you actually abandoned, rather than just left to cool your head, etc...)
Hope that clears things up a bit. If you have any other questions, please let me know. If not, and you have not yet, please rate my answer AND press the "submit" button, if applicable. Please note that I don't get any credit for my answer unless and until you rate it a 3, 4, 5 (good or better). Thank you, XXXXX XXXXX luck to you!
Thank you very much this did clear up a lot of questions that I was having ,I would like to print this conversation if possible or have it sent via email if possible if unable to print.You have been a great help
Thanks again, Larry
After you rate this and submit the rating, it will switch to Q&A, where you'll be able to print.
You're welcome, and again, good luck to you!
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).