She certainly has the ability to have an attorney present with her when meeting with the CPS worker. However, she does not have a right to an attorney. You may have this confused with a criminal case. In a criminal case, a suspect has the right to have an attorney present when being questioned. There though, the person is facing potential incarceration. In the context of CPS questioning, the person is not facing incarceration and does not have the right to having an attorney present.
.I hope you found my answer helpful. If so, please click on "OK", "Good" or "Excellent" service. This is necessary for me to be paid for my work and so that I can get credit for assisting you. Even if you are a subscription member, you will need to click on one of the positive indicators. Your question will not close, and you will still have the opportunity to follow-up if needed. .If you are not yet satisfied with my answer, please do not yet rate my service. Instead, please click on the "Reply to Expert" and let me know what else I can do for you. Please only rate my answer when you are fully satisfied..Also, several customers have asked how they may direct a question to me in particular. If you specifically want me to assist you in your legal matter, just put "FOR JOSEPH" in the subject line and I will gladly pick up the question as soon as I am on-line..Leaving a bonus is not required but doing so is certainly appreciated! Thank you and good luck.
I do understand what you mean a person in a criminal case a suspect has the right to an attorney because they are facing potential incarceration but isn't that the same thing that's going on if a CPS worker decides to take an issue in front of a judge, (is that a juvenile court judge?), and everything that is said by my daughter isn't that entered as fact. I guess I'm confused because even though she's not specifically looking at potential incarceration depending on what is said to a cps worker determines if my grandchild goes into incarceration. I guess I'm looking at it as her 5th and 14th amendment rights are being violated in the process of a so-called investigation (status report). Am I wrong in thinking this? Also, I'm still curious about the psychological exam and it not being ordered by a judge, can she retract that verbal agreement and get her own therapist (since that also wasn't ordered by a judge?
Unfortunately, you are mistaken about the application of those rights, they simply do not apply in the context of a CPS investigation.
As to the therapist, she does have the ability to retract the agreement she made. As you alluded to, she is only legally required to do what was ordered by a judge. If the therapist was not ordered by the judge, then she is not required to follow thru and may see a therapist of her choosing. Of course, this could change if the judge later enters a specific order.
So there's no due process at all for a parent when dealing with this agency?
I should probably also add that the cps call was made by a 'aunt' that has been stalking and harrassing her for the past 2 years. It's just recently gotten worse because my daughter chose to cut all ties off with her last November 12'. This all includes 'parental interference' to the degree that my daughter had to call the cops on the 'aunt' because she wouldn't give the child back to my daughter after a overnight stay at the aunt's house. This same aunt went on the web and printed off so-called temporary custody paperwork and pawned it off as 'oh it's paperwork that allows me to take him to the doctor if necessary if your at work', which she turned around and is now trying to say it was temporary custody even though temporary custody has never been given to this aunt by a judge. So, my daughter has been trying to get away from this person that is bipolar and is on med's. Now CPS is trying to say that if my daughter doesn't adhere to a psychological eval than they are going to take my grandson and either put him in foster care or place him with this aunt who has a record on top of everything else which includes Assault 4th, failure to obey an officer and Theft. Is a CPS worker allowed to just put a child anywhere they want or does a judge make that decision? We are dealing with a vengeful person and it doesn't seem fair.
No, due process applies to CPS cases as well. However, your question began by discussing a right to an attorney. As to that, there is no right to an attorney when being questioned by CPS. I feel we're getting a bit redundant on this particular issue as I've stated this several times. If there is something specific within this issue that you don't understand, please let me know.
As to placement, CPS may need to place a child quickly and, in those situation, the placement might be done without the prior blessing of the court. However, where that occurs, the issue will be brought before the judge soon thereafter. Then, after being reviewed by the judge, the placement might be rejected by the judge, thereby requiring a different placement.
We began this discussion about an hour and a half ago. It has grown late and I am signing off for the evening. Please feel free to respond, if necessary, and know that I will be back online tomorrow. I thank you in advance for your patience.
I will not take up anymore of your time, I appreciate the info you've given but I still feel that the tactics taken by the worker by demanding a psych eval falls under coersion and intimidation tactics especially since the worker didn't take the child but then again I guess there wasn't imminent danger to the child with probable cause to back up removing the child right away.
So you know, I do not disagree with your assessment of "coercion and intimidation" by the CPS worker. Unfortunately, as we've discussed, there is no right to an attorney in this situation. My hope is that your daughter has learned some valuable lessons on the workings of the court system and will more fully protect herself in the future.
Best of luck to you and your family.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).