Well... when you say A motion in limine cannot be struck. The proper action is to either demand withdrawal of the motion under CCP 128.7 -- or, to simply oppose the motion on its merits.
Opposing counsel writes in POA filed concurrently with MIL:
B.. ANY DECLARATION. EXHIBIT OR SUPPORTING DOCUMENT
5 II SUBMITTED WITH PETITIONER'S
6 II MOVING. RESPONDING OR SUPPLEMENTAL PAPERS IS HEARSAY,
7 II MUST BE STRICKEN. AND CANNOT BE CONSIDERED BY THE COURT
8 II 7. " (a) "Hearsay evidence" is evidence of a statement that was made other than
9 II by a witness while testifying at the hearing and that is offered to prove the truth of the
10 II matter stated. (b) Except as provided by law, hearsay evidence is inadmissible.
11 II California Evidence Code § 1200. Here, Petitioner attempts to request relief and/or
12111assert his claims via the use of myriad letters, reports and/or private records-all of which
13 are being offered for the truth of the matter asserted, and all of which lack the necessary
1411foundation that would permit their admission into evidence. For example, Petitioner's
15 moving papers filed March 5, 2012 rely upon the alleged statements of a mental health
16 II professional to assert the validity of his claims. As discussed above, res judicata
17 II prohibits Petitioner from introducing documentation pertaining to the issues resolved via
18 II the parties' stipulated Judgment But such statements are disallowed as hearsay,
19 II regardless. Thus, all statements proffered by the Petitioner for the same purpose are
20 IIinadmissible as hearsay, as are the attachments and/or exhibits subrnitted by Petitioner
21 with all of his remaining filings, including but not limited to, that paperwork submitted by
22 II Petitioner September 19,2012, November 20,2012, November 30,2012 and February
23 1111,2012. Thus, each of Petitioner's references to letters, notes or records from doctors,
24 IIteachers, administrators, therapists, court dockets or police records are inadmissible and
25 IImust be excluded. California Evidence Code § 1200.
26 II Again, Petitioner selects and/or references documentation pertaining to issues
27\IWhiCh existed at trial, and were addressed in the Judgment-a fact that makes such
28 evidence irrelevant to the instant proceeding, in any case.
So....Socrateaser, opposing counsel want's to strike with an MIL
Petitioner's (MY) references to letters, notes or records from doctors,teachers, administrators, therapists, court dockets or police records are inadmissible and must be excluded.
QUESTION: Should I then based of your last commend OPPOSE TO THE MOTION ON THE MERIT THAT THOSE DOCUMENTS ARE ALL VALID AND WITNESSES WILL BE BROUGHT TO TRIAL TO VALIDATE NEXT WEEK?
OR ..... would it be better to demand withdrawal of the motion under CCP 128.7?
QUESTION: Should I then based of your last commend OPPOSE TO XXXXX THE MERIT THAT THOSE DOCUMENTS ARE ALL VALID AND WITNESSES WILL BE BROUGHT TO TRIAL TO VALIDATE NEXT WEEK?
A: I can't answer this question definitively, because I don't know if the documents are in fact valid. Assuming that they can be validated by your witnesses as subject to the business records exception to the hearsay rule, then you can simply respond that the records complained about are all covered by the business records exception, that you will produce witnesses to properly authenticate the documents at trial. You can also complain that opposing counsel has made a blanket request to deny admissibility of all of your evidence, and that the lack of specificity makes it impossible for you to respond intelligently, or for the court to make an informed decision concerning the introduction of any specific item of evidence.
If the judge doesn't rule in your favor, I'll be very surprised, because this sort of blanket motion is the functional equivalent of a motion for summary judgment, since it deprives you of the opportunity to develop your case at trial. Strike that -- I won't be surprised. This is family court, and the judge will do whatever he/she feels like doing at the moment he/she decides to do whatever he/she decides to do.
A: The motion isn't entirely frivolous, because it's probably true that some of your proposed evidence is inadmissible. So, I would stay away from the 128.7 motion.
That was very helpful Socrateaser
Can I ask the court for a continuation without appearing next week on the premise that now I need more time to subpoena all the witnesses?
Is there a procedural vehicle (paperwork or on-line request) of some sorts to request more time....
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).