I have a civil procedure question relating to matrimonial law in Westchester County New York. I have been legally separated pursuant to a judgement for eight years and my spouse has now filed a notice of motion to convert to a final divorce. I have no objection to the divorce, but our underlying oral stipulation on child support was previously vacated for non-compliance with the CSSA and contains numerous ambiguities. My spouse is attemtping to use the Proposed Findings and Judgment to bootstrap faulty interpretations of the stip onto the judgement of divorce. All I want to do is propose alternative language for the findings, conclusions of law, and judgment--confined to all that is necessary to grant the divorce (For religious reasons, I do not want to file a cross-motion for divorce with my language). I am a lawyer (in-house regu;atory--not a litigator) and can handle the arguments (simple answer and accompanying legal memo)--I just want to make sure I follow proper procedure. Is providing an Answer that provides the alternative language sufficient or do I need to make another motion? My spouse has not asked for otal argument on the appearance date--so my understanding is that a properly served answer is sufficient. Is this correct?
FWIW, when I had similar issues on an attempt by my spouse to use a Notice of Settlement to convert two years ago---it turned out the court rejected it as improperly filed.
It's very nice to hear from a fellow Jurist, and I would be happy to help out if possible. I'm what I suppose you could call a "procedure geek", so this sort of thing is generally right up my alley.
Could you please just clarify one point for me, in terms of the procedural posture of the case?
I'm referring to your prior descriptions:
Since those dates, could you just briefly describe what has transpired? In particular, I'm wondering about any new developments or changes since those previous posts (so I can avoid duplication or repetition)?
Some further background is helpful. There is a long procedural history, but this is what's relevant for today
Dec. 2005: Judgment of Legal Separaiton Entered.
July 2006: Basic Child Support Vacated.
August 2007: Basic Child Determined and ordered by Court--BUT THE JUDGEMENT WAS NEVER AMENDED TO REFLECT THIS ORDER. My spouse/counsel tried to do so, but the revised findings etc., she proposed were wrong and I said I would challenge them--such that they were never filed.
May 2011: wife tried to proceed to a divorce on a Notice of Settlement with the same faulty revised findings etc. I did not think this was the right procedural step, and while I was willing to concede grounds for the divorce, I submitted counter findings of fact, conclusions of law and a proposed judgment--narrowly tailored to grant the divorce. This was accompanied by a Memo of Law explaining the counter proposals.
August 2012: Supreme Court said it could not sign any documents because there was a Judgement of Separation and that a Summons and Complaint for divorce must be filed and proceed as a contested or uncontested divorce.
My wife's present motion presumably satisfies that August 2012 demand. I don't want to contest grounds for the divorce, but simply wish to submit counter FoF, CoL, and a Judgment that contains all essential information for a divorce without prejuding any potential future actions on the stip. My experience in 2005 was that if language is in the FoF, etc., it creates a presumption (impression may be better word) that is hard to overcome--even if those FoF, etc., are later shown to be false.
Perfect! That's exactly what I needed to know. Thanks.
Hi there Counselor,Thanks for writing back...great to hear from you!You're quite welcome...my pleasure entirely.Thank you for taking the time to write back and let me know my answer was helpful, which means more to me than I can say.
Hang in there and know I'm holding a good thought for you!Kind regards,Ben, J.D.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).