no the criminal case was first
yes. his daughter was the vicitm
Yes I believe so
Hi, I am a moderator for this topic. It seems the Professional has left this conversation. This happens occasionally, and it's usually because the professional thinks that someone else might be a better match for your question. I've been working hard to find a new Professional to assist you right away, but sometimes finding the right Professional can take a little longer than expected.
I wonder whether you're ok with continuing to wait for an answer. If you are, please let me know and I will continue my search. If not, feel free to let me know and I will cancel this question for you.
Thank you for your patience, your business is very important to us, we are waiting on the Professional with the right expertise to come online. Feel free to let us know if you would like us to continue searching for a Professional or if you would like us to close your question.
We appreciate your understanding!
I have a current case very similar to this where the family court is consistently permitting more contact than the criminal court and I have to go to criminal court to address the matter. Let me see if I can provide some assistance for your situation...
As I understand it, your client is on probation for a sex offense. Further, as a condition of that probation, he is prohibited from having contact with his minor children. However, there is also a family law case and that case does permit contact.
The important thing here is that he is on probation. Period. if he violates that probation, he will likely be arrested, prosecuted and, potentially, put in jail. In the current situation, if he has contact with the child, this will constitute a violation of his probation.
There is a potential cure to the problem though. Your client might consider filing a motion with the court to modify his conditions of probation. As part of his argument, he could indicate that the family court is wanting contact and is ready to facilitate contact. With that in mind, the criminal court may well be willing to modify his conditions of probation to allow contact.
.I hope you found my answer helpful. If so, please click on "OK", "Good" or "Excellent" service. This is necessary for me to be paid for my work and so that I can get credit for assisting you. Even if you are a subscription member, you will need to click on one of the positive indicators. Your question will not close, and you will still have the opportunity to follow-up if needed. .If you are not yet satisfied with my answer, please do not yet rate my service. Instead, please click on the "Reply to Expert" and let me know what else I can do for you. Please only rate my answer when you are fully satisfied..Also, several customers have asked how they may direct a question to me in particular. If you specifically want me to assist you in your legal matter, just put "FOR JOSEPH" in the subject line and I will gladly pick up the question as soon as I am on-line..Leaving a bonus is not required but doing so is certainly appreciated! Thank you and good luck.
I understand that, "The important thing here is that he is on probation. Period. if he violates that probation, he will likely be arrested, prosecuted and, potentially, put in jail."
What I need to know is what does the law say. Which order has the authority over the other?
I think you misunderstand, neither has "authority" over the other. What you have here is a family court order that permits visitation. Separately, you have a criminal court order that prohibits visitation. The family court order does not require visitation, it merely permits it.
The issue is that there is a conflict between the two orders. To resolve this, and as I detailed above, he should consider filing a motion in the criminal court to modify his conditions. To accomplish that goal, he could even inform the criminal court of the family court order permitting contact. If he does so, he may very well accomplish his goal and have the order modified, thereby bringing the two orders in line with one another.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).