In determining best interests of a child for purposes of determining custody or visitation arrangements ... the court shall consider the following
1. The age and physical and mental condition of the child, giving due consideration to the child's changing developmental needs;
2. The age and physical and mental condition of each parent;
3. The relationship existing between each parent and each child, giving due consideration to the positive involvement with the child's life, the ability to accurately assess and meet the emotional, intellectual and physical needs of the child;
4. The needs of the child, giving due consideration to other important relationships of the child, including but not limited to siblings, peers and extended family members;
5. The role that each parent has played and will play in the future, in the upbringing and care of the child;
6. The propensity of each parent to actively support the child's contact and relationship with the other parent, including whether a parent has unreasonably denied the other parent access to or visitation with the child;
7. The relative willingness and demonstrated ability of each parent to maintain a close and continuing relationship with the child, and the ability of each parent to cooperate in and resolve disputes regarding matters affecting the child;
8. The reasonable preference of the child, if the court deems the child to be of reasonable intelligence, understanding, age and experience to express such a preference;
9. Any history of family abuse as that term is defined in § 16.1-228 or sexual abuse. If the court finds such a history, the court may disregard the factors in subdivision 6; and
10. Such other factors as the court deems necessary and proper to the determination
The judge shall communicate to the parties the basis of the decision either orally or in writing. Except in cases of consent orders for custody and visitation, this communication shall set forth the judge's findings regarding the relevant factors set forth in this section.
Obviously factor #10 is a "catch all" to be used just in case the statute doesn't cover something.
In your case, and please correct me if I am perceiving your query incorrectly, it sounds like your concern is a moral one. You are concerned that the mother has a "live in" some of the time, i.e. the boyfriend. Since they are not married, you are concerned about the impression this gives your daughter. Also, the mother is going to school, works, etc. so she has less than adequate time to care for your daughter. Does this about sum it up?
If I were you, I would consult a family law attorney in your area to get legal advice about the local courts, their views on this type situation, and whether or not you have a reasonable chance at a change in your visitation schedule to include additional visitation, or even a change in custody. If you do not know of an attorney in your area, the Virginia State Bar attorney referral service may be able to help.
Many "old school" judges still follow the traditional view of mom having custody, but you may have a shot at changing that if you wish. I generally advise "dads" that it is a little harder uphill battle for a dad to get custody, but if you can show that you are better suited for additional visitation or for custody outright, you should try. Your lawyer will have to take all the facts you give him or her and formulate a plan to try and change visitation and/or custody.
One thing that will help; make a list of all the specific things that bother you. The live in, mom has school three nights a week, the child is with you now more than she is with mom anyway, etc. etc. Be specific. EVERYTHING that bothers you. Take this list with you to talk to an attorney.
I hope this helps you. I wish you the very best with this legal situation. Take care,
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).