It appears that you are online. Can you see this?
Very good. Thank you for your question.
If I may, I would like to start by telling you about a case that I handled because the outcome of that case makes for a good demonstration of how the law works.
Some time ago, I represented a mother who was alcoholic. There were two kids involved and the mother had been the primary caretaker of the kids for most of their lives. The parents entered into a 50/50 custody arrangement, but around two years into it the mother relapsed. The mother was in-patient for around 60 days, and the father filed for full custody. The court ultimately ended up awarding the mother primary custody, split approximately 70/30. The court's reasoning was that even though the mother was an alcoholic, and even though she relapsed, she addressed the problem--she sought appropriate medical care, the kids were never in danger, and the father's unwillingness to consider the best interests of the children in his over all conduct demonstrated that the kids would be better off primarily in the mother's care.
Because the nuances of every case are different, you should not rely on this information as advice or apply it to a specific situation without a more thorough consultation with counsel. But that said, custody is decided based on the best interests of the children, and that varies from situation to situation. If a parent has an alcohol problem, it is a factor for consideration. If the parent needs treatment for their chemical dependency and receives in-patient treatment, the absence may be a factor of consideration as well. Your question is how in-patient treatment for alcohol dependency/addiction may impact a parent's custody rights, and the most accurate answer is that there is no law that says that it will give rights to one parent or the other.
The situation has to be examined in its totality, and the only question for the court is "what is in the best interest of the child".
So nothing would prevent either parent from requesting a custody modification any time there is a material change in circumstances, but if a change of custody is not deemed in the child's best interests then it won't happen.
Does that make sense?
ok did the father keep the children for 60 or willII being the grandmother be able to keep th 70-30% as it is now
What does the existing custody order say about the right of first refusal?
Oftentimes, a custody order will allow one parent to have the right to take the child first before the child is put into the care of someone else during the other parent's custody time. This is called the right of first refusal--if a father has this right, the mother would have to offer to let the father have custody of the child before giving the child over to a grandparent.
If a custody order grants a right of first refusal, the non-custodial parent would have first-dibs. If the custody order does not grant a right of first refusal, the non-custodial parent would not have that right.
Is that clear?
I did press yes I understand that,I'm sorry. Do I have Grandpart rights or visitation
I apologize, could I bother you to rephrase the question? I do apologize.
I am sorry, it appears that there might be a technical problem; it appears that you wrote a response, but the response is invisible, and I will therefore need it written again. If the problem continues, I will switch us out of "chat" mode and into a different format--the different format will still allow us to read what each other writes, but it is slightly slower; hopefully, that will not be necessary. I do apologize again and thank you for your patience.
do have as a grandparent rights to visitation
So the question about grandparent visitation rights is all within the state of Pennsylvania, correct?
Unfortunately, the response was invisible again. I am going to switch us out of "chat". As I mentioned, we can still see what the other writes, but it will be somewhat slower. Please wait one moment.
yes I can Brandon
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).