Was he ever legally determined to be the child's biological father either through DNA test or through voluntary acknowledgment of paternity signed by both of you?
The reason I am asking is that he couldn't relinquish any rights if he never legally had any...
Also what was the motion/petition for and who filed it?
If I have answered your question, PLEASE CLICK THE GREEN "ACCEPT" button NOW, so that I receive credit for my work. Bonuses are optional and greatly appreciated. If you need additional clarification on this question, just click "Reply" and I will be happy to help you. Please give me as much detail as you can so that I can respond after receiving all the relevant details.
No DNA test
No acknowledgement of paternity signed by both of us.
He did sign a "Father's Affidavit for Voluntary Relinquishment of Parental Rights," which was notarized. This is the paper which was filed, but then never acted upon. I am a single mom, and was scared that I would not be given custody without someone willing to adopt my daughter.
Ok, at this point then he has neither legal rights nor obligations to the child. He wouldn't be able to have any type of visitatation or custody, but also woudn't have to pay some child support.
Until he is determined to be the legal father of the child, then he neither has nor can give up any rights.
So as of right now, you are the only legal parent the child has and obviously would be the sold custodian and guardian.
However, In California, there is no statute of limitations for establishing paternity. So he could come in at any point in time in the future and file a paternity suit to legally determine if he is the child's biological father. But if he does, he will likely get hit with not only current child support, but also back child support retroactive back to the child's birth.
So let the motion die of its own accord and keep your fingers crossed he doesn't come back around wanting to establish paternity.
That would be the question...if he just signed a relinquishment without having legally acknowledged his paternal rights, it wouldn't be effective. And unless you are married at the time of the child's birth, he is on the birth certificate, you and he both sign a voluntary acknowledgment of paternity, or he has a DNA test done, then he wouldn't be presumed to be the legal father of the child.
Texas Family Code
§ 160.204. PRESUMPTION OF PATERNITY.(a) A man is presumed to be the father of a child if:
(1) he is married to the mother of the child and the child is born during the marriage;(2) he is married to the mother of the child and the child is born before the 301st day after the date the marriage is terminated by death, annulment, declaration of invalidity, or divorce;(3) he married the mother of the child before the birth of the child in apparent compliance with law, even if the attempted marriage is or could be declared invalid, and the child is born during the invalid marriage or before the 301st day after the date the marriage is terminated by death, annulment, declaration of invalidity, or divorce;(4) he married the mother of the child after the birth of the child in apparent compliance with law, regardless of whether the marriage is or could be declared invalid, he voluntarily asserted his paternity of the child, and:
(A) the assertion is in a record filed with the bureau of vital statistics;(B) he is voluntarily named as the child 's father on the child 's birth certificate; or(C) he promised in a record to support the child as his own; or
(5) during the first two years of the child 's life, he continuously resided in the household in which the child resided and he represented to others that the child was his own.
§ 160.607. TIME LIMITATION: CHILD HAVING PRESUMED FATHER.(a) Except as otherwise provided by Subsection (b), a proceeding brought by a presumed father, the mother, or another individual to adjudicate the parentage of a child having a presumed father shall be commenced not later than the fourth anniversary of the date of the birth of the child.
So since he is not a "presumed father" he wouldn't fall under the statute of limitations in TX and this statute would apply:
§ 160.606. NO TIME LIMITATION: CHILD HAVING NO PRESUMED, ACKNOWLEDGED, OR ADJUDICATED FATHER. A proceeding to adjudicate the parentage of a child having no presumed, acknowledged, or adjudicated father may be commenced at any time, including after the date:(1) the child becomes an adult; or (2) an earlier proceeding to adjudicate paternity has been dismissed based on the application of a statute of limitation then in effect..
So the long and short of it is that since he has not been established as the legal father, he has no rights. But there is also no limitation on when he could appear and file a paternity suit to ask for them.
Well, you can file your own paternity action, have him established as the legal father and then have him sign a voluntary termination of parental rights. That way he would be giving up any legal rights to the child. But yes, if he is established as the legal father, he would have the right to seek some type of joint custody. It is unlikely that he could get full custody of the child unless the court somehow found you to be an unfit mother due to abuse or neglect. Being a single mom would not be grounds for him to get full custody.
Once he has signed the TPR, if you get married later, your spouse could legally adopt the child
But if he has signed the petition to terminate his righst, he may think that he has legally done so already and you may not have anything to worry about. But until you go through the full process to legally terminate his rights, he could legally reappear and pursue a paternity action.
So it might be best to leave it alone for a while until you were sure he was gone, then file a termination of parental rights action and see if you could get it done uncontested if they can't find him.
You are very welcome.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).