Family Law Questions? Ask a Family Lawyer Online.
Thank you for using JustAnswer. I am researching your issue and will respond shortly.
Pardon my spelling. Under "already tried"...yet she wants payment for 3 full weeks
Since there is an ambiguity in the contract, the court is going to attempt to resolve the ambiguity in a way that does not negate any of the provisions of the contract. That is, they are going to read the first clause and read the second clause in a way that does not conflict with the first clause, if at all possible. But ambiguities are going to be interpreted against the drafter of the contract (which sounds like her). It sounds as though she is talking about "subsidy payment", which probably means subsidy through a government, agency, etc..., and the requirements for those are that the child must attend the entire week, in that she does not get paid (from the subsidies) if the child is not there the entire week.
Now that is a valid way of interpreting the contract, and as such, it does not conflict with the prior clause.
This would be the most likely interpretation by the court.
Should it go to court.
And if so, it would determine that you were financially responsible for the amount owed (the full three weeks).
I know this is probably not what you wanted to hear, but it's the law. I hope that clears things up anyway. Good luck to you!
Thanks. I forgot about the gov subsidy . That blows, because of her notice of termination, I had no choice but to get my child with another provider and I'm having to pay BOTH parties. I'm satisfied w/the answer even though I don't like it. Thanks again.
Is there anything else I need to do other than hit "accept"?
I'm sorry that I couldn't give you a better answer. You could continue trying to negotiate, but legally speaking, she has the right to this amount.
DISCLAIMER: Answers from Experts on JustAnswer are not substitutes for the advice of an attorney. JustAnswer is a public forum and questions and responses are not private or confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege. The Expert above is not your attorney, and the response above is not legal advice. You should not read this response to propose specific action or address specific circumstances, but only to give you a sense of general principles of law that might affect the situation you describe. Application of these general principles to particular circumstances must be done by a lawyer who has spoken with you in confidence, learned all relevant information, and explored various options. Before acting on these general principles, you should hire a lawyer licensed to practice law in the jurisdiction to which your question pertains.
The responses above are from individual Experts, not JustAnswer. The site and services are provided “as is”. To view the verified credential of an Expert, click on the “Verified” symbol in the Expert’s profile. This site is not for emergency questions which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service (last updated February 8, 2012).