How JustAnswer Works:
  • Ask an Expert
    Experts are full of valuable knowledge and are ready to help with any question. Credentials confirmed by a Fortune 500 verification firm.
  • Get a Professional Answer
    Via email, text message, or notification as you wait on our site.
    Ask follow up questions if you need to.
  • 100% Satisfaction Guarantee
    Rate the answer you receive.
Ask Lawrence D. Gorin Your Own Question
Lawrence D. Gorin
Lawrence D. Gorin, Family Law Attorney
Category: Family Law
Satisfied Customers: 1544
Experience:  30+ years family law experience. QDROs, UIFSA, UCCJEA expertise.
Type Your Family Law Question Here...
Lawrence D. Gorin is online now
A new question is answered every 9 seconds

My girlfriend asked me to help her get a better, and safer ...

This answer was rated:

My girlfriend asked me to help her get a better, and safer vehicle for her because we were expecting a baby. We went to the dealership together and we were told that she would not qualify on her own or qualify with a co signer. She asked me if I would put the lease in my name. She stated in front of the sales manager and finance manager that she would be the one responsible for making all of the payments. She had 10K negative equity from her old car that rolled into this lease which raised the total of the lease and the payment. Since she verbally agreed in front of the sales manager, and finance manager to make all 39 payments of $702.97 and repay me the first payment of $1,500 which was due at signing I entered into the lease. Since then she has left the state and the car. I do have record of her making 4 payments before she backed out and left. Now I'm stuck with the payments and the $10 of her negative equity that was rolled into the total. Can I sue her and recover my losses?
YES, you can sue her. BUT whether you will recover your losses is another story.

First, your lawsuit against her would have to be filed in a court that would have "personal jurisdiction" over the person you are suing. In other words, you have to file in the state where she resides. You might be able to file in Small Claims Court, providing the amount you seek to recover is within the jurisdictional limits of the Small Claims Court in which you file the lawsuit. (
Small Claims Court jurisdictional limits vary from state to state.)

Keep in mind, however, that suing and winning simply means you get a "money judgment," meaning a piece of paper signed by a judge that says she owes you money in the amount of allowed by the court. It is then up to you to enforce and collect on the judgment. And if the person you sued simply does not have the money, you judgment you obtained from the court may not be worth the paper on which it is written. And if you try to enforce it, the "judgment debtor" may very well be able to file for bankruptcy and simply discharge the debt obligation. And then you don't get anything.

In hindsight, of course, you should have never acted as her banker, creditor, money lender and financial guarantor. But that is now water under the bridge. Just be sure to never do that again.

NOTE: I realize that this answer may not be entirely to your liking, and I regret being the bearer of information that you really don’t want to hear. But it would be unfair to you and unprofessional of me were I to provide you with anything less than truthful and honest information. I hope you understand.

Having answered your question, please acknowledge by clicking the green “ACCEPT” button. That will allow me to be paid for the time spent in answering your inquiry. Your question will not close, and you will still have the opportunity to follow-up if needed. Also, please add a few words of compliment in the feedback space. It isn’t required but it sure boosts my ego! Thank you!

Lawrence D. Gorin and 2 other Family Law Specialists are ready to help you
Customer: replied 8 years ago.
I dont have anything in writing, everything is verbal and witnessed by people at the dealership like I mentioned in the email. Are you saying I can sue her because that is enough evidence, meaning the evidence is admissible?
Yes, you can sue her, and the evidence (if properly presented in accordance with the court's rules of procedure) is admissible.

You said: "She asked me if I would put the lease in my name. She stated in front of the sales manager and finance manager that she would be the one responsible for making all of the payments. She verbally agreed in front of the sales manager, and finance manager to make all 39 payments of $702.97 and repay me the first payment of $1,500 which was due at signing I entered into the lease." Although nothing was put into written form, she made an OFFER and you ACCEPTED the offer and agreed to her proposal. That amounts to an ORAL CONTRACT.

Oral contracts are legal and if breached (as appears to be the situation in your case) are enforceable in court. As explained below, however, this often involves a "proof problem" since it often boils down to one person's word against the other. But in your case, you have WITNESSES to the oral contract. If your ex-girlfriend denies your claim as to the existence of the oral contract (or the terms thereof), you would then have to call on the witnesses to appear in court and substantiate your claim.

Oral Contracts
Written contracts are usually obvious. What aren't as obvious are the contracts that we form when we speak with each other.

If you agree to do something, sell something, or buy something and someone else acts on your statement, you may have formed an enforceable contract. Things can get a bit tricky though since rules vary about what contracts can be formed verbally.

If someone does act on your statement, a contract has still not been formed if:

1. You have agreed to do something that is illegal. You cannot enforce a contract to do something that is a violation of any local, state, or federal law.
2. If the terms of the agreement were not specified. If an amount or a specific action was not indicated, you don't have a contract.
3. If one or both parties were mistaken about a fundamental part of the agreement (ex. I agreed to purchase your stereo but I thought we were talking about the big one and you thought we were talking about the small one)
4. The subject or terms of the agreement are prohibited under the law. (examples: real estate contracts must be in writing and credit card companies cannot charge 50% annual interest)

Oral Contracts in Court
Oral contracts are by definition, contracts that are verbal, not written. Therefore, the terms or even existence of these contracts are often somewhat harder to prove in court. If you were to decide to sue the other party for breach of an oral contract, you would be required to show that the oral contract exists. This may or may not be possible.

Assuming that the other party disagrees about the existence of or the terms of your oral contract, you must be able to prove your case by "a preponderance of the evidence". In other words, the majority of the evidence must exist on your side.

Witnesses are always helpful, especially if they are not otherwise associated with you. If someone that you don't know witnessed the agreement and understands what the agreement was all about, that can be pretty potent evidence.

If the person knows you or has something to gain, that person's testimony will be more suspect and the judge will probably want to see other evidence to corroborate (reinforce) that testimony.

Actions can serve as corroborating evidence. If you wrote a check to serve as a deposit or down-payment, that would be pretty incontrovertible evidence that you intended to form a contract, even if you were to put a stop-payment on it later.

When suing under an oral contract, the most critical factor is your integrity in the courtroom. The natural tendency is for most people to try to minimize or even lie about something that they may have done wrong.

But if you do lie and you get caught, there is probably very little else that will help you. This is especially true if you are the plaintiff and the other person comes across as being honest.

Other factors may also corroborate the terms or existence of an oral contract. Your level of organization, your demeanor (attitude), your ability to provide documents that would corroborate your testimony are often the proof that is necessary to win an oral contract dispute.

Your Best Case
Remember, if you are suing under an oral agreement, the other party has already won unless you can prove your case. You must first prove that there was a contract, what the terms were, that both parties understood the contractual relationship, and that the other party violated or breached the contract. It's the old 'guilty till proven innocent' adage that rules the day and these tips will help you present your best case:

1. Get organized. Know how you will present your case, what your evidence is, and hopefully know what the other party will be claiming so that you can counter it.
2. Collect all of your documentation. The judge will want to see it. This includes pictures, checks, letters, receipts, and all other pertinent materials.
3. Show original documents if possible. Since copies can easily by changed, the original document will help eliminate questions and doubts.
4. Provide witnesses if possible. Be sure to talk to each about being honest and controlling their temper and language.
5. Control your anger no matter what the other person says. Don't interrupt the judge or the other party. You want to be seen as cooperative. Let the other person annoy the judge.
6. Never lie to the judge, even if you have done something wrong. It may come back to get you later. Even if the other party cannot prove that you lied about your action, the judge may be able to see through it.
7. Present only the facts and stay on the subject. The judge cannot rule based on information that doesn't pertain to the case at hand. The other party may have been convicted of assault but if it wasn't against you or doesn't pertain to your suit, forget about it.
8. If you make a statement, be prepared to support it and provide as much evidence as possible.
9. Visual evidence is usually the best followed closely by or supported by reports from esteemed professionals or public servants such as doctors, a CPA, or public service employees such as a police officer.
10. Practice giving complete and articulate answers based on fact, not emotion. The judge cannot rule based on how you feel about something unless you are claiming emotional damages.
11. Be nice!

When reasonable, it is best to obtain legal representation from a qualified and experienced attorney. You must however, balance the costs against the potential loss. It's not reasonable to spend a thousand dollars to be represented in a case where a few hundred are at stake.

Be sure to consider the long term costs as well however. A claim may only cost you a few hundred dollars in cash but cost you in your reputation and future business dealings.


Related Family Law Questions